Originally Posted by
Marshal_Lannes
I'm pulling together some ideas for an artificer PL and was wondering if anyone had tried running one using both the inquisitive tree and arcanotechnician giving you access to both strong spellcasting and ranged DPS? You'd want at least 30 APs in each tree and both the T5s are good so you're forced to make a difficult choice. AT gives Lightning Motes SLA, 20 electric spell power, +3 evo DCs, and charged recoil. All are fairly essential for an arty caster. T5 Inq gives No Holds Barred, 10 ranged power, and 30% alacrity. Those take your xbows to submachine gun level. Still, I would lean toward AT. Pick up INT to hit from Harper and that's about all your APs.
In comparison, if I went pure AT I'd splash in Feydark so I'd have greater color spray but then you're sitting around with a lot of excess APs with not much to spend them on. Pure Inquisitive I'd go Battle Engineer and that does increase your xbow DPS but for the price of giving up all your viable casting? Doesn't seem worth it to me.
Feats might get a bit compressed. Having to fit in both casting and xbow feats might be tough. For those used to building artys, could they be squeezed in?
In terms of gear, obviously, both hands are taken up by xbows but the Ravenloft belt comes in handy here giving you electric spell power and lore. I'm sure this hybrid would work just fine in heroics but I'm uncertain what would happen in epics. What ED would I run in? Epics tend to reward an all-or-nothing approach and would I have spread myself a bit too thin?