Apparently everyone in "the community" has been given what they wanted, then turned around and complained about receiving it - even the community members who lobbied against changes asked for by other community members.
What I've been wondering is if he considers himself a member of the community - which would mean he's just as guilty as everyone else in the community; or as an entity sepperate from "the community" and thus blameless - which calls to question why no one else is an entity outside the community?
Not that it would matter, the sanctimonious "lesson teaching" would continue regardless...