There is no guarantee that Green Steel crafting will be available forever. Seriously -- there is no guarantee. People have had years to acquire Shroud ingredients and craft their chosen gear. You see where I'm going here (and yes, it's reductio ad absurdum). They probably aren't going to actually do this, because the player base would revolt, but that just means that part of their decision basis is just "how many people will be upset with this decision?".
Anyway, I know that I'm now a little less likely to potentially waste time farming a recurring event if I'm not sure I'm going to be able to farm enough mats to complete my desired items.
Which is cool for me -- more time for non-DDO activities!
And hey, this might help a little with the lag we see during Festivals, if people don't farm them quite so much!!
Pointless discussions are the foundation of social media. What percentage of discussions on Facebook, Twitter, blogs, or forums have any realistic chance of having a meaningful impact on the world?
Requiring that conversations serve some useful purpose seems like an awfully high standard to apply to forum discussions about a computer game...
bit of a dik move there Hal.
Nice how you cut out one part of the line from the post and commented to the line out of context....
considering the original conversation was about Mabar ingredients being removed due to duping.
Argo: Degenerate Matter - 200
Jotmon (HC 34/45 , RC 42/42 , IC 12/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 116/158)
Jotlock (HC 38/45 , RC 25/42 , IC 15/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 75/158)
Whatthetruck (HC 38/45 , RC 42/42 , IC 15/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 111/158)
If you read the whole thread you would see that I am referencing another poster. He was then personally attacked for it by another poster.
If I had spent real $$ on shards for mats and then Turbine destroyed them, I would not be shy to say so. As I said earlier , I would be pi**ed-off.
"You're a Jedi, Harry"
- Gandelf
Off topic here, but here goes:
Every discussion NEEDS a purpose. Be it small or great, but it needs a purpose nonetheless. It doesn't need to change the world or something like that. It just needs to change SOMETHING. Even if that something is totally unrelated to the discussion topic (like you enjoying a silly forum fight).
When you have a discussion and you know that none of the participants (or viewers) are going to change their mind even a little, you should not be having a discussion. A pointless discussion is the foundation of endless attacks with a level of sanity approaching zero and it can only lead to harm. Either mentally (you get irritated) or physically. For example, if 2 people have different set of givens and they argue on the products of those givens, they may as well both have excellent arguments about why their set of given truths create their point of view and still never agree with each other because they never realize they are starting with different set of given truths. This discussion is bound to get ugly with one-line dismissal comments ("You're simply wrong") to attacking the person's credibility ("I was expecting something like this from someone that has...") and then finally simply making each other their personal enemy.
And then there's the type of non-existent discussion. When 2 people simply agree with each other there's no point in talking about it. If talking continues it means someone needs to let off steam because he had disagreed on this matter with someone else that is not available for a discussion. That's kind of what's going on in this topic. Everyone wants the same thing, some have accepted it's not coming back, some haven't and some debate a different issue ("You shouldn't be upset that it's not coming back"). The developers don't seem to be changing their take on this though, and that was the disagreeing party.
Finally, here's something you should NEVER say in a discussion: "The point of a discussion is to hear different views on a matter, not agree on something". With this, you're stating that you will not change your mind in any way and that the other party has been wasting their time so far. Sure, if at some point you realize that you have a different set of given truths (ex. If the topic is a matter of perception like "This is ugly or this is nice") then by all means stop the discussion with the excuse that you'd never agree anyway. But every party enters a discussion hoping to achieve something (even if they don't admit it).
As for having expectations of an online game forum: I have those expectations from the entire civilization, not discriminating. Civilized discussions should follow some rules and I will remind them when I talk to my family, my friends, a stranger, to a forum, to a parliament, to a group, to a king/queen. Anywhere really.
My main server is Khyber. Have toons in almost every server for favor purposes. The Faltouts
Sure they could. Decisions & choices have consequences, people have to be prepared to accept them. Besides, I have no intention of having the past compete with the present, as I have voiced in another Mabar thread. Myself and at least one other individual have stated that the Hall of Heroes would be great landing spot for a short visit by the trader.
No, actually it was voiced in several areas that the duping at the time was a concern. The Summoning Chamber ran for YEARS despite the lag & reports of mote duping. What really brought it to a head was the duping of the +5 tome Signets. Motes = In-game player economy, Tome sales = Real World economy. Yes, the Chamber did cause performance issues for the game, but I would not overlook the correlation there with the introduction of the Signets & the timing of the closure.
Did it ever occur to you that in that time frame that people could have been working full shift? Or traveling? Or some other life event that prevented them from getting to the game & doing what you described? There are plenty of us in that boat, and to make such a sweeping generalization demonstrates your lack of consideration for these types of circumstances & fellow players. You act as if everyone held out intentionally, a position to which you couldn't possibly know to be fact.
Finally, you act as if people hoarded mat's like gluttonous swine, when the actuality of it is that there of those of us who held onto them because we were TOLD to & given the impression that Mabar would return!
Oh look, the next post under Cordo's "...not gone for good" one:
To each his own. I'm not looking to cash in a hoard of motes, all I want to do is upgrade some wraps and a few cloaks that I didn't get to do previously.
Last edited by Nonesuch2008; 10-01-2015 at 07:26 PM. Reason: typo
"When asked if the developers hate the players, as they make so many challenging jumping puzzles, their response was that they have what they consider a “… normal amount of contempt for the players.” This is good. A dungeon master should always nurse a healthy contempt for his or her players."
You were the one who asserted that if we can't alter Turbine's decision in this instance, then further discussion is pointless. I responded to your implied usage of the term -- that discussion is pointless if it can't lead to immediate, measurable changes.
I agree with you that this isn't really the sole purpose of discussions. Within the context of social media, I'd argue it's not even the primary purpose.
To the people who care about an issue, then discussions of why people are unhappy, how they feel unfairly treated, and/or how they wish things would have been handled, aren't pointless. If nothing else, it gives them the opportunity to express how and why they feel, and perhaps to change some hearts that might influence further decisions. It may also simply make them feel better to express their unhappiness and feel that their complaint has been heard (which is why I think it would be foolish for Turbine to block such discussions).
I don't see how the two sentences I highlighted are particularly consistent with your earlier post. If this discussion doesn't have to change Turbine's decision in this case to serve a purpose, then I don't see a particularly compelling argument that this discussion is unquestionably pointless. This isn't a one-on-one discussion between Turbine and a particular customer, this is more of a round table discussion involving quite a few people. Turbine's actual participation in the discussion has been minimal thus far -- I haven't seen a single response to any of the points I've made, or to a lot of the other views expressed. Since Turbine isn't really an active participant in this discussion, I don't see why it matters much how much their hearts have already been hardened on this issue.
I think some of the people that have posted in this thread have brought up good points. They may not persuade the Turbine powers-that-be, but that doesn't mean they aren't influencing anyone. I've seen a couple of posts that imply that people have at least slightly changed their minds over the course of this discussion.
Something else you shouldn't do in a discussion is to foreclose people expressing their opinions simply because you don't think they can convince the powers-that-be to behave differently in the short-term future.
Actually, just in general, I don't think it's very helpful to tell people they shouldn't talk about an issue...
No...sorry... they couldn't put Joe back now after telling people in this thread....not threads from yesteryear....thats its ok to destroy their mats. Could you imagine them saying "ok destroy it, its worthless", then a couple days later saying "HAHA...sucker, i was kidding....all that stuff you trashed?...now it has some value again!!! ZING"
Your vacation schedule is not Turbine's concern. You had plenty of time to "upgrade your wraps"...or whatever. Do you want them to extend every limited time thing anytime someone says they were on vacation, or had to work, or their doggie was sick? You snooze, you lose
Whether or not Mabar was to return doesn't change whether or not you hoarded ingredients like a....what you said. I guarantee you have farrrr more in the bank than is needed to do what you describe
Try letting go. Its liberating
Yet you don't seem to be letting this thread go, despite seeming not to care much. Odd.
Maybe you should liberate yourself by letting this thread go?
My personal view is that it seems odd that because some people gained from duping, those that did not should have some of their stuff made useless.
I suppose it does kill the argument that dupers use: "my duping does not affect your game". It seems that they do affect me.
Are there any characteristics/buffs that I should look for when partying that might identify someone who is likely to have duped? So that they can be avoided?
He left the name, at which the world grew pale.
No need to be rude
Im just surprised how much value people attach to this stuff. A lot of people must have been doing mabar wrong because my experience was....skulls, fingers, keys....you couldn't move without getting tons of this stuff. The dragon used to give up to four scales... I made everything i ever wanted....and then some in ONE EVENT with not much effort
If you destroyed all your junk and they restarted mabar tomorrow, you'd be mabar rich again in what?....two hours?
Whoopee.
People assumed their ingredients would be useful in following years.
They assumed wrong.
Get used to the fact that MMOs are all about change. Don't get too invested in items, builds, events, mechanisms, whatever. Your time is a resource you should use wisely. Don't put all your time-eggs in one basket.
/off to level some DDO alts and later some World of Tanks
11-01-2013, 11:45 AM
09-12-2014, 11:42 AM
02-26-2015, 02:48 PM
09-29-2015, 12:02 PM
This comment in of itself doesn't say Mabar is done, just not for use with Night revels.
Perhaps someone can find a post where Dev's tell us that we should use up our Mabar ingredients because they will be removed.
Couldn't actually find anything where Cordovan "lets us know more" until... Cordovan drops the hammer
09-29-2015, 01:33 PM
Argo: Degenerate Matter - 200
Jotmon (HC 34/45 , RC 42/42 , IC 12/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 116/158)
Jotlock (HC 38/45 , RC 25/42 , IC 15/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 75/158)
Whatthetruck (HC 38/45 , RC 42/42 , IC 15/21 , EC 51/51 , RP 111/158)
Cheating is natural, normal even. There will always be cheaters in everything. It is to be expected.
Lets be clear who is to blame here.
TURBINE.
They wrote the dodgy code.
Their poor testing regime failed to spot the flaws in their code.
Their QA team passed the dodgy code for Live use.
And they continued to run the Event even once they were aware that cheats were exploiting their code.
Oh and lets not forget the soul crushing LAG (also TURBINEs fault) that meant 3 out of 4 runs wiped.
The cheats got everything they wanted, while honest players struggled to get just one effin cloak.
I understand Turbines reasoning, but it is flawed. The cheats may have billions of motes, but they already have all the items they want so those Motes are of no use to them except in trade. So here is the solution...
- Make the OLD Mabar ingredients BTA, so the cheats cant sell/trade them.
- Bring back the Mabar Vendor (this one time only), so players can use up Mabar collectables.
- Allow swapping of NEW ingredients to OLD, so players who don't have enough scales, fangs etc can complete a Mabar item.
Oh, and make all the Mabar items BTA.
Last edited by visibleman; 10-02-2015 at 12:48 PM. Reason: spelling
Argonessen: Breyard, Kayuss, Breymer, Vilar, Zhanmadao
Disclaimer: All my posts are in the official DnD language of Common. Common is not a standardised language, so if you think you see a spelling mistake - you are wrong!
There was no "move" - I thought my comment made the rest obvious: they are removing Mabar ingredients because they are removing Mabar. They aren't removing Cove, ice games, etc ingredients because they are not removing or otherwise overhauling those Festivals.
Removing Mabar ingredients while already removing Mabar is an easy and logical move. Removing the other ingredients would be a much bigger issue.
I don't know what you hope to gain by trying to defend cheating. It is wrong and just because there are people who like to break rules doesn't mean that we should just put up with them. In fact if everyone refused to associate with anyone who cheats there would be far less cheaters.
And the consequences of cheating are on the cheaters - no one else.