Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 140

Thread: +20 hearts

  1. #81
    Community Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan View Post
    We currently have no interest in putting restrictions on the Warlock in regard to reincarnation, but we would consider the community's preference if people felt strongly that there should be restrictions on the class for a period of time after it debuts.
    I think there should be no restrictions on the class. Even though I will play it from 1-20 to re-gain my completionist, if others choose to be creative that is their decision.

  2. #82
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    did you buy a word of the day calendar? Uska accused turbine of trying to cheat the players. Argue it anyway you like.
    Saying Turbine put the hearts out close to an impending new class release is not an accusation of cheating the players. There is no bad intent regarding putting out a new class. What wont be admitted here of course is the assumption being made in addition to what was posted. Add that to the fact that now that the clarification requested by the same poster is provided, it invalidates any accusation on that front which could be made.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  3. #83
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    It wont bother me if someone is a level 28 warlock on day one. Ill be in their groups, observing class performance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  4. #84
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    Saying Turbine put the hearts out close to an impending new class release is not an accusation of cheating the players. There is no bad intent regarding putting out a new class. What wont be admitted here of course is the assumption being made in addition to what was posted. Add that to the fact that now that the clarification requested by the same poster is provided, it invalidates any accusation on that front which could be made.
    it is an accusation when say they did so players would buy them for the warlock class. Uska did that. Spin it any way you want, you always do.

  5. #85
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    it is an accusation when say they did so players would buy them for the warlock class. Uska did that. Spin it any way you want, you always do.
    Is that somehow cheating the players?

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    did you buy a word of the day calendar? Uska accused turbine of trying to cheat the players. Argue it anyway you like.
    where is that claim made?

    Whats not being admitted here is the assumption being made about the post, which was not posted.
    Last edited by Chai; 05-15-2015 at 03:56 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  6. #86
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    Is that somehow cheating the players?



    where is that claim made?
    the accusation of bait and switch means trying to cheat the players. Can it really be this hard?

  7. #87
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan View Post
    We currently have no interest in putting restrictions on the Warlock in regard to reincarnation, but we would consider the community's preference if people felt strongly that there should be restrictions on the class for a period of time after it debuts.
    No restrictions, please.

  8. #88
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    the accusation of bait and switch means trying to cheat the players. Can it really be this hard?
    Requesting clarification to eliminate the possibility that Turbine would be accused of bait and switch in the future =/= accusation of bait and switch.
    Last edited by Chai; 05-15-2015 at 03:59 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  9. #89
    Community Member Grosbeak07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ToastyFred View Post
    There should be NO restrictions.

    Let us play the danged class as we wish.

    Thank you.

    I disagree, there should be a short restriction, say a couple of weeks to prevent capped Warlocks on day 1.

    That being said, I'm not opposed to Vet Status, though I think Iconics should be delayed from using as well for a short amount of time.

    My reasoning is that if a theoretical new player starts playing DDO just to play a Warlock, but sees most of the vets already capped out on Day 1, it takes something away. Restrict things for two weeks and then let it go is what I would do.
    Magical Rings are well... magical. - Gandalf

  10. #90
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    and that claim was made by the same poster?
    Yes. I guess a quiz and review of the thread is needed. First uska asks about a possible bait and switch later uska straight says turbine released them so people would buy them for warlocks. You can connect these dots right?

  11. #91
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    Yes. I guess a quiz and review of the thread is needed. First uska asks about a possible bait and switch later uska straight says turbine released them so people would buy them for warlocks. You can connect these dots right?
    Requesting clarification to eliminate the possibility that Turbine would be accused of bait and switch in the future =/= accusation of bait and switch.

    Consumer 101. If unsure how its going to work, ask how it will work. Calling out that if players are allowed to assume how it will work rather than receiving clarification may lead to players accusing bait and switch later on (as they have in the past in some specific situations) is not an accusation in the present of the same.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  12. #92
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    Requesting clarification to eliminate the possibility that Turbine would be accused of bait and switch in the future =/= accusation of bait and switch.

    Consumer 101. If unsure how its going to work, ask how it will work. Calling out that if players are allowed to assume how it will work rather than receiving clarification may lead to players accusing bait and switch later on (as they have in the past in some specific situations) is not an accusation in the present of the same.
    Asking is not accusing we agree. Later in the thread uska straight said they did it on purpose that is an accusation. Education 101. Read the post I posted in yellow one page back. Seriously

  13. #93
    The Hatchery
    2014 & 2016 DDO Players Council
    Dandonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan View Post
    We currently have no interest in putting restrictions on the Warlock in regard to reincarnation, but we would consider the community's preference if people felt strongly that there should be restrictions on the class for a period of time after it debuts.
    There's a lot of pay-to-skip anyway, if people feel like forking over cash to avoid a fairly quick run to TR... let them. I'll get there in my own time.
    DDO: If a problem cannot be solved by the application of DPS, you're not applying enough.

  14. #94
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    Asking is not accusing we agree. Later in the thread uska straight said they did it on purpose that is an accusation. Education 101. Read the post I posted in yellow one page back. Seriously
    I read that, and its not an accusation. I still premise an assumption is being made on top of what was posted which is leading you to this conclusion.

    Marketing is always done on purpose.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  15. #95
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    I read that, and its not an accusation. I still premise an assumption is being made on top of what was posted which is leading you to this conclusion.

    Marketing is always done on purpose.
    ok we will agree to disagree on what constitutes an accusation.

  16. #96
    Community Member hp1055cm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slarden View Post
    The devs are not responding to this thread while the sale is active. Why do you think that is?Expect to see a response on Monday(possible) or no response at all (most likely)
    Quote Originally Posted by Susquehana View Post
    My guess is they all have uska on ignore.
    LOLZ.... Best response in this entire thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uska View Post
    I am trying to,protect some people who may assume they will work when in fact they may not. Me I,don't care.
    Just what these forums need... people who "don't care" chiming in to "protect" people too ignorant to look out for themselves.

    If you really wanted to help people you could pose your question directly to Tur-bine and then come here to post the response.
    It isn't necessary to stir up the drama by posting **** here in the forums.

  17. #97
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slarden View Post
    The devs are not responding to this thread while the sale is active. Why do you think that is?Expect to see a response on Monday(possible) or no response at all (most likely)
    now you can admit you were wrong.

  18. #98
    Ultimate Completionist
    2014 DDO Players Council
    Open Guild for All Founder - Hardcore

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan View Post
    We currently have no interest in putting restrictions on the Warlock in regard to reincarnation, but we would consider the community's preference if people felt strongly that there should be restrictions on the class for a period of time after it debuts.
    I prefer no restrictions.

    My main reason is that not everyone reads forums/ect and might plan out something not realizing it will not work. The resulting confusion and frustration could be bad for the health of the game.

    Those considering a +20 heart will also consider triple past life bonuses resulting in two full lives regardless.

  19. #99
    Founder xberto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    978

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MadCookieQueen View Post
    Honestly...I'd like to just to +20 LR into to it to keep my completetionist PM and then use another toon to actually try the class out.

    So I'm all for...no restrictions for LRs, Vets and etc.
    I don't want restrictions either. The only reason I purchased a +20 is to "bounce" through the new class to keep completionist. I'll play the Warlock grind with my caster alt toon.
    Sarlona
    Gutter-Oowaoonah-Ute-Mauhl-Rockroll-Gutsack-Talrasha

  20. #100
    Community Member ToastyFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uska View Post
    There should be restrictions based on the pnp class
    He was asking about reincarnation restrictions and I answered his question.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload