Neither have you. A sample of 5 with only one of your bows hitting for critical damage isn't empirical data. Why are you so bent on arguing when you're the one trying to figure out which weapon is better? You know what your set up (which still hasn't been told to anyone), and you've only done 5 samples.
Like I said, it is incompetent testing by what seems like someone who doesn't actually care to find the answer, but wants to argue that their sample size of 5 is better than anecdotal evidence from someone else who has played multiple lives. A small sample like that is far worse than anything anecdotal. You didn't even test enough to get a critical hit from each bow. That's pathetic.