Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 81
  1. #61
    Community Member FestusHood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,707

    Default

    You guys crack me up. You're the uber forumites that can't play anything under epic elite because it has no challenge. Yet apparently you can't get through Korthos without bugged gear.

    For all those people with old first generation icy burst weapons. Let me clue you in to something. By modern standards those weapons are junk. You should have replaced them long ago if twinking was such a big issue for you.

  2. #62
    The Hatchery Galeria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,615

    Default

    So, there will be no more BtA random items from Sharn, Shan-to-Kor, Chronoscope and Red Fens? Because why bother making them BtA when they are the same junk as any other chain?

    To be fair, you should have admitted that as well. Random BtA items with lowered levels will be going away in the automated junk system because apparently the architect of this awesome piece of coding doesn't know how to program an exception for them.

    I have no problem with fixing things that were obviously coded incorrectly, but completely invalidating the lowered-min-level BtA items is just lazy.
    A PUG is like a box of chocolates
    Get people to read your post.

  3. #63
    Hero
    Mmm... purple!
    PurpleTimb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    581

    Default

    I support and applaud the devs cleaning up old code and fixing the processes. I hope this will result in fewer, easier to fix bugs in the future.

    That said, retroactive changes to nerf years old loot is bad for the game. It helps no one; fixes nothing that was broken; and only serves to take away enjoyment from players. Does it break the game? No. Will players get by without their ML:0 rings? Of course. But if you give something to someone and then take it away you shouldn't be surprised that they are unhappy about it. I can and do level my TR characters just fine without ML:0 rings. However, I spent a lot of time and effort acquiring those items and took pride in having something unique that was later unattainable. Taking them away takes away one more fun and interesting thing from the game and makes me less likely to want to bother trying to get the next new thing that comes along.

    I also took a lot of pride in my Superior Glaciation IX dagger I earned from many, many hours of coin jumping. Two updates later it became a +1 dagger again. Guess how much time I've spent on the ice jumps since then?

    What's next on the dev's to do list? Perhaps we need to 'fix' all those original green steel items out there that still are ML:8? We can't let that bug continue to plague the game.

    I understand the need for Turbine to continually update the game to prevent it from stagnating. But why does it seem repeatedly that programming time is being spent working on things that will make the game less fun to play?
    Last edited by PurpleTimb; 08-16-2013 at 02:43 AM. Reason: grammar is hard!

  4. #64
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    292

    Default

    i guess i can deconstruct a bunch of weapons and items, thus freeing up alot of bank space, eliminating any need to purchase additional storage.
    if life gives you lemons, make lemonade.
    if life gives you pickles, well you're screwed. because pickleade sucks.

  5. #65
    Community Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FestusHood View Post
    For all those people with old first generation icy burst weapons. Let me clue you in to something. By modern standards those weapons are junk. You should have replaced them long ago if twinking was such a big issue for you.
    Not really. Some of them were pretty darn nice considering they weren't bound. The really twink items now are BtCoE so even if they are a bit powerful they are less useful in my books if they can only get used once for a couple levels and not by every character you have as they level.

    Of course L1-4 is so easy that half the time at least I'm too lazy to twink anything out beyond a stack of pots and my House P clickie anyway lol.

  6. #66
    Community Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltEireson View Post
    Just for info - pure good would be +2 under new system as far as I am aware. At some point I think they changed pure good on random loot gen to match that of crafting i.e. +2 but left existing random loot gen items with pure good alone. But as every random item is working off the same basis (in theory) then I'd say pure good on all random gen stuff will be +2.
    alright. but even if pg is +2, and ghost touch is +2, im still getting an extra +1 somewhere. does metal material add to enhancement level?

  7. #67
    Hero
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,487

    Default

    The game needs more incentives to TR, not fewer. This is a step in the wrong direction.
    Khyber: Ying-1, Kobeyashi, Nichevo-1 | 75 million Reaper XP

  8. #68
    Community Member HernandoCortez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpone View Post
    The game needs more incentives to TR, not fewer. This is a step in the wrong direction.
    I agree with that.

  9. #69
    Community Member mons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FestusHood View Post
    You guys crack me up. You're the uber forumites that can't play anything under epic elite because it has no challenge. Yet apparently you can't get through Korthos without bugged gear.

    For all those people with old first generation icy burst weapons. Let me clue you in to something. By modern standards those weapons are junk. You should have replaced them long ago if twinking was such a big issue for you.
    Its really not so much about the items themselves but the time spent grinding for them. The players knew about the rings, Turbine knew about the rings and even profited from them. The icy burst kits/weapons fall in the same category, time spent grinding/trading all thrown out the window.

  10. #70
    Community Member mons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PurpleTimb View Post
    I support and applaud the devs cleaning up old code and fixing the processes. I hope this will result in fewer, easier to fix bugs in the future.

    That said, retroactive changes to nerf years old loot is bad for the game. It helps no one; fixes nothing that was broken; and only serves to take away enjoyment from players. Does it break the game? No. Will players get by without their ML:0 rings? Of course. But if you give something to someone and then take it away you shouldn't be surprised that they are unhappy about it. I can and do level my TR characters just fine without ML:0 rings. However, I spent a lot of time and effort acquiring those items and took pride in having something unique that was later unattainable. Taking them away takes away one more fun and interesting thing from the game and makes me less likely to want to bother trying to get the next new thing that comes along.

    I also took a lot of pride in my Superior Glaciation IX dagger I earned from many, many hours of coin jumping. Two updates later it became a +1 dagger again. Guess how much time I've spent on the ice jumps since then?

    What's next on the dev's to do list? Perhaps we need to 'fix' all those original green steel items out there that still are ML:8? We can't let that bug continue to plague the game.

    I understand the need for Turbine to continually update the game to prevent it from stagnating. But why does it seem repeatedly that programming time is being spent working on things that will make the game less fun to play?


    I actually made 3 of those glaciation 9 scepters, funny that the 2 that I put in the stone of change to bind are now junk while the 3rd that I didn't bind still has the glaciation on it.

  11. #71
    Hero DanteEnFuego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mons View Post
    Its really not so much about the items themselves but the time spent grinding for them. The players knew about the rings, Turbine knew about the rings and even profited from them. The icy burst kits/weapons fall in the same category, time spent grinding/trading all thrown out the window.
    This... So now my rings are needed. They did at least make them 70 durability, but at ML 11 for +6 stats, I can Crappith Craft better ones...

    /fail
    "The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves." Niccolò Machiavelli
    Thelanis: Arbix Completionist (23rd Life), ArbySoul, ArbyBarb, ArbyPriest, Arbificer etc.

  12. #72
    Community Member adam1oftheround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    285

    Question THIS is what we need, to soften the blow. And yes, this does blow low...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonos View Post
    bogus!!! at the very least they should have put Masterful Craftsmanship II on it or something.
    Can we please have masterful craftsmanship II or III applied to all of the bound to account end rewards that just got nerfed?

    So all my min level one items are now level 3, 5, 9, 11, or 13. While the random loot get items are now better than the end reward items. So that 5 charge haste clickie min level 5 that was on the auction house is now better than the bound to account items that I have been using for the past 17 lives. Good to know.

  13. #73
    Community Member adam1oftheround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    285

    Angry Do the right thing

    Quote Originally Posted by thouston View Post
    i guess i can deconstruct a bunch of weapons and items, thus freeing up alot of bank space, eliminating any need to purchase additional storage.
    I AM NOT CRITICIZING WHAT DEVS DO, I AM MAKING A SUGGESTION FOR HOW TO DO THE RIGHT THING.

    The right thing would be to offer a refund for anyone who bought Cannith Crafting, Madness Chain, or some other kind of compensation for those who spend their time grinding for an item only to have it nerfed. Another option would be to allow those items masterful craftsmanship II or III.

    When I play the game, I want to feel happy. Not like I just got swindled in a BAIT AND SWITCH SCAM.

    It seems to prevent creep, the Devs give us something nice, like the bound to account chain end reward items with lowered min level, xp and epic tokens from the Cannith Challenges, Epic wands with low min level, paralyzing items that allow auto-crit, Cannith Crafting, Guild slot items and so on. Then when it has made it's cash cow, they nerf it. Same story for the end rewards bound to account. If you buy this expansion, you can get no min level rings, once the cash cow was made, they nipped it as well. First time it was shame on you, letting it happen again, is shame on me.

    I want to be able to say I am happy with the state of the game and the direction it is taking. That is not presently the case.

    I feel dirty now for having played this bait and switch game. Yuck!!! LOGGING OFF.

  14. #74
    Community Member adam1oftheround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    285

    Cool Devs spending time to make the game less fun, nicely stated

    As stated in this quote, the summary is: founding players are having their toys taken away, and this is where the Devs are spending their time. Don't forget the +4 no min level weapons that are still out there too as long as this is where we are spending our time, lets do a good job of it.

    Quote Originally Posted by PurpleTimb View Post
    I support and applaud the devs cleaning up old code and fixing the processes. I hope this will result in fewer, easier to fix bugs in the future.

    That said, retroactive changes to nerf years old loot is bad for the game. It helps no one; fixes nothing that was broken; and only serves to take away enjoyment from players. Does it break the game? No. Will players get by without their ML:0 rings? Of course. But if you give something to someone and then take it away you shouldn't be surprised that they are unhappy about it. I can and do level my TR characters just fine without ML:0 rings. However, I spent a lot of time and effort acquiring those items and took pride in having something unique that was later unattainable. Taking them away takes away one more fun and interesting thing from the game and makes me less likely to want to bother trying to get the next new thing that comes along.

    I also took a lot of pride in my Superior Glaciation IX dagger I earned from many, many hours of coin jumping. Two updates later it became a +1 dagger again. Guess how much time I've spent on the ice jumps since then?

    What's next on the dev's to do list? Perhaps we need to 'fix' all those original green steel items out there that still are ML:8? We can't let that bug continue to plague the game.

    I understand the need for Turbine to continually update the game to prevent it from stagnating. But why does it seem repeatedly that programming time is being spent working on things that will make the game less fun to play?

  15. #75
    Community Member adam1oftheround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    285

    Question Georr Watson has spoken, and I agree

    Can we get a bone here? A nice perk or a refund is in order for those of us who bought these packs because the end rewards and fast epic tokens were the talk of the day.

    Quote Originally Posted by GeoffWatson View Post
    Some players bought the Reign of Madness pack because of the No-minimum-level rings.
    Some players bought the Sharn Syndicate pack for the BtA low level items.

    Yet another "Screw the players after they've bought it" like the "accidental" Cannith Challenge XP nerfing.

    Geoff.

  16. #76
    Founder & Hero
    2016 DDO Players Council
    Uska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dendrix View Post
    Existing loot shouldn't be changed.

    refer back to thomas convenat, 2nd trilogy "give him back something broken"
    If loot was broken it should be fixed and that includes existing loot people shouldnt be allowed to have loot that others no longer can access just because they didnt start playing the game soon enough.


    Beware the Sleepeater

  17. #77
    Founder & Hero
    2016 DDO Players Council
    Uska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adam1oftheround View Post
    Can we get a bone here? A nice perk or a refund is in order for those of us who bought these packs because the end rewards and fast epic tokens were the talk of the day.
    Shouldnt be a perk or refund for people loosing and advantage that was clearly a bug they got the advantage of the bug while it worked and shouldnt be surprised that it was fixed.


    Beware the Sleepeater

  18. #78
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    484

    Default BTA quest reward having lower ML a bug???

    Quote Originally Posted by Uska View Post
    Shouldnt be a perk or refund for people loosing and advantage that was clearly a bug they got the advantage of the bug while it worked and shouldnt be surprised that it was fixed.
    I fully understand what the devs wanted to achieve with this change, and its good that most loot now works automatically without having to set lvls. But the BTA items being lower ML was certainly not a bug, rather it was by design. Otherwise something like the sharn syndicate would have had to offer far better items. Just look at them, they are usable at about lvl 2-4 and even then nothing special really. But if you got them on a character, you could use them for exactly that lvl range.

    When their minimum lvl goes to 4 (while the items otherwise stay unchanged) there is just no incentive at all to run it, save maybe the favor or to try out your rogue in the rescue quest (the Bookbinder rescue).

  19. #79
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dendrix View Post
    refer back to thomas convenat, 2nd trilogy "give him back something broken"
    Way to invalidate your argument utterly.

  20. #80
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    321

    Default Turbine-what have you done here? Feather of sun????

    Thanks for the link to the Lamania Forum.
    I just make a short summarise, because I am not on Lammania and I was always thinking, that the biggest DEVS mistake are
    not going live:

    1. Feather of Sun stated 2 month ago, that the Min.Lv of items will be accounted automatically in the future.
    NO Probs with this, but

    2. Nearly never the players get better items retroactively (with new augment slots, dragon scale armor etc.)- so WHY the hack
    you think that players items should be nerved retroactively? Are we just playing balls for you? We all care a lot about this game...
    and most players in these threads told Feather of sun NOT to go live with this system!

    3. After this short comment of feather, where he no stated that a retrocatively change of old items is WAI, we all could assume
    a. Turbine will change the Lamanian system or
    b. Turbine will delay the new loot system till the negative response is somehow smoothed.

    4. There were players in the tread that nearly have crafted 200 icy burst items and should loose them only for the whim of a DEV/new unwanted System?

    So my suggestion is:

    Change the old treasured items (rings, icy burst) back to normal (manual input if necessary as before) or just take the old treasure system back so long its not possible to
    get an overall positive response from the player base. There are also lots of other problems coming with the new system...

    Thanks
    Best regards
    Turbine

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload