
Originally Posted by
Rodasch
Unfortunately, when you put all your answers inside the quote itself, it makes it pretty annoying to try to quote you back to reply point by point.
So bear with me as I try to cover the relevant points.
While I personally do not use sp potions much, if at all, on my casters...I do recognize that there are times when the ability to use them can make a difference in a success or failure for some players. In those situations, if they want to spend the money (either plat or TP) to have the sp potions available to overcome the limitation of their spell points being depleted, they are still paying a penalty for having failed to manage or extend their spell points in the form of having to use potions they bought specifically for that purpose.
In that sense, it could be said that blue bars ARE still limited, as they are not automatically filled up, it requires additional purchases to start filling them back up. (Echoes of Power only fills it up so far, not enough and not fast enough to justify considering it "automatically filled up" in this case).
Now, if we address the "availability" issue of refilling tools (such as bauble), which you seem to feel is ok because it takes a lot of farming and is limited to one use per rest...let's talk about clerics and divine vitality enhancement.
A cleric with Divine Vitality enhancement (including a great many of the hirelings, which are MUCH cheaper than sp potions by any stretch of the imagination, and provide more sp than any mana potion if used properly) is a source of a great deal of spell points in a very short time...and if they're radiant servants, they are a source of ACTUAL infinite spell points, as their turns regenerate. The catch is that after they've burned all their turns, they have a 2 minute regen timer on turns...but they are only limited by time, level of the enhancement, and initial turn counts.
Is that a lesser or greater concern than sp potions?
"But they can't use DV on themselves".
1.) You can use a cleric hireling with DV on yourself.
2.) 2 clerics with DV and Radiant Servant PrE can infinitely recharge eachother's sp and never once need to use a shrine in any mission if they desire.
I could see the concern if spell point potions were sold by VENDORS in game for plat (instead of being loot and auction only), or if they were free in the DDO store. In that case, they could be said to be a zero investment "endless sp" solution, and would deserve some sort of rethink.
My position is that because they are technically limited supply in game (yes they are), and cost a significant amount of Turbine Points in the DDO Store (for an expendable), they are balanced by that fact in and of itself.
Now, let's be clear. A timer on potions would not directly affect my personal playstyle, but would possibly indirectly impact me based on other people's reactions to it and the changes to their play style. So I have no actual horse in this race. My concern is the principle of the issue itself, and the motivations behind the actual suggestion.
I seriously doubt this thread was inspired by concern for the game's longevity, health, or content balance. While a few who came later may be motivated by those things, this thread itself, I feel, was not. Certainly I cannot PROVE that notion, as it is just a subjective opinion, and I concede that. But nonetheless, it's how I feel.
What I'm attempting to do here is bring reason, balance, and critical thinking to the discussion to try to nullify the hyperbole, emotional blackmailing, psychological bullying, and other irrational tactics being used by BOTH sides in an attempt to look cooler and righter than their opposition.
It's not about who's cooler, more-elite, or more awesome as a person. It's about one simple thing: Are the negatives inherent to the current status of sp potions sufficient to justify a re-evaluation of that status and the investment of developer time and effort to develop and implement a change? I don't feel that there is sufficient justification for changing them at this time, but that doesn't mean I'm right. I've just not seen anything yet which convinces me otherwise.
People need to get their egos and emotions out of the way and look at this rationally. When they learn to do that, we might get somewhere.
At least YOU were able to do this and speak with me like a rational human, and for that I thank you. I think that it will be difficult for either you or I to convince the other to change their perspective, because we both have thought our positions out pretty thoroughly. I respect your belief, even if I disagree.