I've seen many times that high-crit-range weapons are preferred over high-base-damage weapons. For identical (x2) crit multipliers, crit range is deemed more important than base weapon-die.
So...
- Rapier/Scimitar (d6 = 3.5 average, 18-20) > longsword (d8 = 4.5 average, 19-20)
... etc., despite the lower base damage for non-crits, which runs contrary to the ''intuitive'' choice.
- Falchion (2d4 = 5 average, 18-20) > Great Sword (2d6 = 7 average, 19-20)
Since I'm sure this has been debated and discussed and supported in excruciating detail countless times before, could someone point me to a thread where I can follow the math and/or logic?
thx.