Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Community Member Wraith_Sarevok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    499

    Question Smiting on Dragontouched Armor Uses the Wrong Effect and Other Inconsistencies

    This is a big enough problem to warrant a discussion and developer response:



    * The Sovereign Rune of Smiting on Dragontouched armor incorrectly uses the older effect instead: Any critical hit on a construct forces the target to make a DC 23 Fortitude save or die. This effect stacks with the new smiting.



    * Additionally, smiting weapons have an undocumented +2 enhancement bonus against constructs, much like a Construct Bane weapon. This is not found on Disruption, Banishing, or any of the similar item effects. More evidence is listed here: http://forums.ddo.com/showpost.php?p...3&postcount=10.



    * The Mace of Smiting incorrectly lists the older effect, but uses the new version. While it is not listed on its item description, the Mace of Smiting also possess the +2 enhancement bonus against constructs that the Smiting enhancement normally gives.



    Submitted the appropriate bug report. The melee classes would appreciate fixing the Dragontouched version to make it desirable enough to craft! I would also appreciate either explaining or removing the unintended +2 enhancement bonus to Smiting effects. As much as melee likes the buff, it doesn't make any sense and shouldn't be there.
    Last edited by Wraith_Sarevok; 02-04-2012 at 01:08 PM. Reason: can actually mesh those last lines together since they describe the same item.
    Khyber: Iqus Tres (Half-Orc Barbarian 20 / Epic 5 / Legendary Dreadnought 5), Ixupi (Drow Sorcerer 20), Outlake (Warforged 7 Monk-in-progress), Petroglyph (Warforged Artificer 16)

  2. #2
    Community Member ArcaneMelee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    397

    Default

    I'd rather the DT effect stays put, actually. If it was WAI, I'd actually get one.

    But since it'll get fixed, no need to bother. It's easier/safer for me to swap weapon sets than armor.

  3. #3
    Community Member bbqzor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith_Sarevok View Post
    I would also appreciate either explaining or removing the unintended +2 enhancement bonus to Smiting effects
    Its not unintentional, its a direct copy from PnP where Smiting provides an enhancement +2 higher against constructs. Being found on other mutations like Banishing doesn't really have anything to do with it, they've never been directly identical. It is just one of many effects not wholly listed on items (Madstones guard proc for example). That doesn't mean its a bug.

    As for the DT rune, its hard to say if its unintentional. It also works on ranged weaponry which some runes do not, and a few other differences. Its unique enough I'd assume they went in and intentionally made all those changes since its seemingly more than like one forgotten or missed alteration might be, but like a lot of things left the description outdated. Shrug, guess a response will maybe say for sure, but again just because it's different doesn't mean it's wrong.

    This does kind of highlight the advantage that better (more accurate, more transparent, etc) descriptions on things would have for the game at large. Its definitely an area that could use improving.

  4. #4
    Community Member Wraith_Sarevok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    499

    Default

    Where is that listed?

    All I could find through Google was that the PnP Mace of Smiting is considered a +5 weapon against constructs and a critical hit destroys them (no saving throw). DDO doesn't even implement that feature correctly nevermind it's bonuses to outsiders.

    Since the other effects are implemented in identical ways, none of which are similar to PnP, this +2 bonus is inconsistent enough to be considered a bug. It's not described anywhere either which makes it very suspicious. I didn't even know it existed until I came across it so neither will most other people.
    Last edited by Wraith_Sarevok; 02-04-2012 at 01:38 PM.
    Khyber: Iqus Tres (Half-Orc Barbarian 20 / Epic 5 / Legendary Dreadnought 5), Ixupi (Drow Sorcerer 20), Outlake (Warforged 7 Monk-in-progress), Petroglyph (Warforged Artificer 16)

  5. #5
    Community Member Therrias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    560

    Default

    Smiting rune appears to be not functioning with handwraps.

  6. #6
    Community Member AMDarkwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Therrias View Post
    Smiting rune appears to be not functioning with handwraps.
    It never has. NO, and i mean NONE of the 'on attack' rune effect work with handwraps. Never has, neverwill.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload