I don't really think this is something that we NEED and it's not really important, but I do think it would be better if Barkskin and Stoneskin covered just the skin and not the armor. After all, these spells are described as changing the user's skin. I don't know how difficult it would be to change the coding or graphic or whatever.
I was kinda bored and made of picture of what it would look like. Took me about ten minutes using ms paint. Here's my elf wearing a mithral chain shirt with Barkskin:
Not a perfect crop but whatever. What do you think?
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Hybrid View
-
08-09-2011, 02:41 AM #1Community Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 467
Barkskin and Stoneskin to cover just skin?
Last edited by Gregen; 08-09-2011 at 02:43 AM.
-
08-09-2011, 09:12 AM #2Community Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 433
+1, It should have been that way from the beginning. I'd also like to see barkskin and stoneskin "meld" together, instead of one overlaying the other. The chances of either of these happening is slim to none.
-
08-09-2011, 09:21 AM #3Community Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 5,501
/signed!
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
"Of course it is. Are YOU going to question beholder's artistic sense?"
-
08-09-2011, 09:23 AM #4Bwest Fwiends
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 0
As glad as I am that Stone/Bark skin spells got some badly needed graphics upgrades in the spell-pass, I very much would prefer that it worked this way.
/signedExit, pursued by a bear. ~ William Shakespeare (stage direction from The Winter's Tale)
.60284.
-
08-09-2011, 09:28 AM #5Community Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 50
/signed
also: what's the point in getting an armor kit when you're stoneskinned most of the time in a dungeon and can't see your nice armor kit?
-
08-09-2011, 09:30 AM #6Community Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 80
I personally would prefer that stone & bark functioned like camo does- you get the effect when it is cast, then it fades away.
-
08-09-2011, 02:48 PM #7Community Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 467
I actually don't like the way camouflage works now. It used to make you stay green and transparent, which I thought was cool and made sense.
Originally Posted by negativeprogression
-
08-10-2011, 12:13 AM #8Community Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 395
/signed
how's this going to work with warforged tho?
A rogue is basically, "Look at me or die."
-
08-10-2011, 02:38 AM #9Hero
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 0
/signed
I was hoping the update to them in U9 was going to do exactly this, but was disappointed when it didn't.Sarkiki - Orexis - Pallikaria - Epithymia - Musouka - Empnefsi | Cannith Server
-
08-11-2011, 11:14 PM #10Community Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 530
/signed... with the caveat of "as long as they're not dedicating resources to this that would go to fixing longstanding bugs, getting us druids, etc"
UDR Loot Rules:
1) No griefing people for pulling loot that dropped in their name
2) When rolling, classes for which the item is "useful" get +10 to the roll
example: Wiz and Barb both roll on a Torc, the barb saying "I'm TRing into an arcane next week"
Wiz gets +10 on his roll
-
08-11-2011, 11:20 PM #11Community Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 541
But the barkskin looks better than my padded pjs.
-
08-12-2011, 01:29 AM #12Community Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 1,086
I think it would be cool, as long as it's extremely quick and easy to change. Seems like a waste of dev time if not.
/sign
Reply With Quote