Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Community Member Asmodeus451's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,138

    Default Ingredient Changes again?

    From the Lamania Release notes for 10.2:

    Several high level Cannith crafting recipes have had their ingredient requirements changed, including shards for Holy Burst and Attack Bonus +4.

    anybody know exactly what these changes are? i'd check it myself but Lama-land wont work on my comp for some reason
    The Funniest Thing I've Ever Read
    Toons: Twengor (pal), Margween (Bard/FTR/Rogue), Nestrana (wiz), Ammerlyn (Arti), Ostarin (Monk) on Cannith

  2. #2
    Community Member Bodic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    silver flame and yugo pots changed up per rrlease notes..

    so should not be favor req'd, but will have a cost/dropped.

  3. #3
    The Hatchery Scraap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,651

    Default

    Tried checking. It's at 75 again.

  4. #4
    Community Member Gratan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Asmodeus451 View Post
    From the Lamania Release notes for 10.2:

    Several high level Cannith crafting recipes have had their ingredient requirements changed, including shards for Holy Burst and Attack Bonus +4.

    anybody know exactly what these changes are? i'd check it myself but Lama-land wont work on my comp for some reason
    Silver flame pot got changed to a new item sold by the same vedor that is account bound. So you still need the silver flame favor on one of your toons on the account just doesnt have to be the crafter anymore.

    I forgot to check the yugo one but i think it is similar.
    Hargrave 20 Pally 1/2ling * Saraph 20 N Human Clr * Azureflame 14/2 CG WF Wiz/Rog * Grimstone 12/2/6 CG Dwf Rgr/ftr/Barb * Ebinn 17/3 Clr/Pally Dwf * Settsu 20 Dwf Monk LN * Nythh 8 Fvs Lg Human * Krisi 20 Sorc Drow LG * Cinderblok 6/12/2 Rgr/Ftr/Mk WF LG

  5. #5
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gratan View Post
    Silver flame pot got changed to a new item sold by the same vedor that is account bound. So you still need the silver flame favor on one of your toons on the account just doesnt have to be the crafter anymore.

    I forgot to check the yugo one but i think it is similar.
    Really have to hand it to the dev's here. They listened to the reasoned and calm feedback from people here on the boards and implemented what they wanted to have in (silver flame/yugo favor req'd on a toon on the account for certain crafting) in the way the community said made the most sense (bta new item that didn't force them to make the pots bta but also didn't force the crafter to be the one w/ the favor).

    Honestly they've listened to pretty much everything the community came out and said on crafting. I still would have rather them left all the old shard recipes alone and made the shards of potential much harder to make at higher level but other than that philosophical difference I love where they've gone after these changes.

  6. #6
    Community Member Jaid314's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gratan View Post
    Silver flame pot got changed to a new item sold by the same vedor that is account bound. So you still need the silver flame favor on one of your toons on the account just doesnt have to be the crafter anymore.

    I forgot to check the yugo one but i think it is similar.
    well, you only need it if you're planning on buying the ingredient rather than finding it in a chest.

  7. #7
    Community Member Diyon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaid314 View Post
    well, you only need it if you're planning on buying the ingredient rather than finding it in a chest.
    Something else to note, I believe the notes said the ones that drop in chests won't be bound, so you could buy them off AH.
    Khyber: Runforr 13/6/1 Rog/Ftr/Mnk, Bakup 3/3/1 Mnk/Pal/Rog (TR Pal), Faylah 14 Mnk (TR Mnk), Janthyra 12/7/1 Brb/Rog/Ftr, Ainbthech 20 Sor, Fliethas 18/2 Fvs/Mnk, Unfilled 12/6/2 Mnk/Rgr/Ftr, Arcanemark 10 Wiz "Don't eat us dragon! We're like you, but smaller. And fly worse." - Kobold Crewman on the Heart of Wind

  8. #8
    Community Member IBCROOTBEER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkrok View Post
    I still would have rather them left all the old shard recipes alone and made the shards of potential much harder to make at higher level ...
    have you tried making the shards of potential for a +5 HB + GB weapon ? they are INCREDIBLY expensive when you add the mats up from shards 6-13 ... and you want to make it harder ? are you crazy? lol
    Sarlona - The Silent Accord
    Choyce (10th life, Rogue/Ranger splash) - Zedekia (20 Favored Soul, 2nd life)
    Vallheru (20 Monk, 2nd life) - Julle (20 Spellsinger Bard)
    Nimblum (20 Rogue) - Xzanthus (20 Wizard)

  9. #9
    Community Member Khurse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,349

    Default

    Both also (iirc) now need the Mystical Plant ingredient thing from Vale quests.

    Can't remember if they were needed last build.

  10. #10
    Community Member Kinerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkrok View Post
    Really have to hand it to the dev's here. They listened to the reasoned and calm feedback from people here on the boards and implemented what they wanted to have in (silver flame/yugo favor req'd on a toon on the account for certain crafting) in the way the community said made the most sense (bta new item that didn't force them to make the pots bta but also didn't force the crafter to be the one w/ the favor).

    Honestly they've listened to pretty much everything the community came out and said on crafting. I still would have rather them left all the old shard recipes alone and made the shards of potential much harder to make at higher level but other than that philosophical difference I love where they've gone after these changes.
    Except that you still need to have every single Silver Flame pack (or VIP) to get 400 Silver Flame favor. This makes the crafting changes seem less like a thoughtful balancing act and more like a pretty despicable bait and switch.

    Both the crafting changes themselves and the entire handling of the situation has been incredibly tone-deaf on Turbine's part, to the point where I can't believe that any one person is actually in charge. This kind of catastrophic decision-making can only come from a vacuum bureaucracy three or four levels removed from the actual game (also allowing them to hide from any direct blame and let MadFloyd fall on his sword, that's a real classy move). It's really frustrating as a player to see a system with so much potential be so poorly handled, not least because it saps hope for future development.

  11. #11
    The Hatchery Scraap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,651

    Default

    So now it's up, after a re-review... they changed the names of things, and added a low drop-rate alternate way of getting them. It's still the same basic premise as before.

  12. #12
    Community Member Diyon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraap View Post
    So now it's up, after a re-review... they changed the names of things, and added a low drop-rate alternate way of getting them. It's still the same basic premise as before.
    Not quite:

    "Two new items can now be purchased from Silver Flame and Yugoloth patron vendors called "Mark of the Silver Flame" and "Mark of the Yugoloth" that can be used for high-level Cannith crafting recipes. These items can also be found randomly in chests and end rewards. Randomly-acquired marks are unbound, while vendor-purchased marks are Bound to Account."

    Being able to bypass the favor or semi-rare drop via AH makes a big difference IMO.

    From the release notes: http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=206066
    Khyber: Runforr 13/6/1 Rog/Ftr/Mnk, Bakup 3/3/1 Mnk/Pal/Rog (TR Pal), Faylah 14 Mnk (TR Mnk), Janthyra 12/7/1 Brb/Rog/Ftr, Ainbthech 20 Sor, Fliethas 18/2 Fvs/Mnk, Unfilled 12/6/2 Mnk/Rgr/Ftr, Arcanemark 10 Wiz "Don't eat us dragon! We're like you, but smaller. And fly worse." - Kobold Crewman on the Heart of Wind

  13. #13
    The Hatchery Scraap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diyon View Post
    Being able to bypass the favor or semi-rare drop via AH makes a big difference IMO.
    To a degree. It does irritate less than taking my 20 into necro 1 and 3 to pick up spares, then never TRing him.

    Of course, that also depends on drop-rate.

    What it does not do, is address the problem of dr breakers by addressing dr breakers directly, instead of hitting one component that you can pull anywhere. (No really, the day the crafting hall closed, I pulled a holyburst from lordsmarch, and 2 from a higher toon killing time vale farming. Actual silver weapons on the other hand...) Nor does it mesh very well with

    Quote Originally Posted by MadFloyd View Post
    That said, I'm already reading loud and clear that any ingredient that can only be obtained by forcing the actual crafting toon to complete content (e.g. favor rewards) is objectionable.
    Understood. Thanks.
    unless we're talking at least the drop-rate of those signets of vol, or for practical purposes, that is an option that may as well not exist, since it's *also* limited by blanks.

    tl;dr : wrong angle still. Far rather they either make the combo expensive with an additional requirement when adding a shard to a silver, or give us some nasties to mow down that aren't benefited by the weapon-flavor-of-the-month (ok, going on years now, but still ). That way, there's already a system in place if they do find certain other ones throw them off later.
    Last edited by Scraap; 07-19-2011 at 10:05 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload