when will the eadq1 rakshasa fights exploit be fixed?

[Gkar]

facepalm all you want, and rant away.

you present a solution for exiting the room without one of the following:
1. dimension dooring out and avoiding the combat.
2. using a hireling to hit the glyph and hireling porting them out.
3. killing the prince in the room to drop the barrier.

you cannot invis, sneak, hide, throw a switch, or do anything else to avoid it, save the items listed above.
you are locked in a room with no exit available until the spawn in said room, a redname no less, is killed.

does that seem like an accident? one intended as an option to be totally avoided six times over in the quest?

go ahead and continue neg repping away. imagine this account is sacrificial at this point anyway, which was the point in actually using it to +rep someone for right action finally.

All three of the methods you give are valid methods BY DESIGN. I'm sorry you don't understand how the game works.

I notice that you haven't been suspended and your thread is still open even though I /reported it for possibly posting an exploit - so I guess its not an exploit eh?

[FastTaco]

It's not an exploit, but there should be an incentive to kill them. Would be perfect with 2-3 chests that can appear in a random room after an illusion is killed, POP style.

[Rawel_San]

You're going to have to explain that one. Raise dead is a lvl 5 spell given to lvl 9 clerics and as the level cap was 10 when the game started there wasn't any point where raising wasn't possible.

Or does my memory from 5 and a bit years ago fail me?

Buggs rolls a sarcasm check and scores a .... 1.

[Buggss]

Buggs rolls a sarcasm check and scores a .... 1.

Hmmm.. I'm not so sure and Arkat didn't think so either.

Maybe you're switching directions quick to not look daft

Rawel rolls a bluff check: 1... fail

[Rawel_San]

Read the rest of that post. I point out that DDoor was in game at that time, and you could buy it at vendors. When I wrote the post I was considering
putting the /sarcasm on /sarcasm off tags in there but it seemed to take away from the joke. Guess I should have. I thought the clearly would be enough
of a give away.

[Buggss]

Read the rest of that post. I point out that DDoor was in game at that time, and you could buy it at vendors. When I wrote the post I was considering
putting the /sarcasm on /sarcasm off tags in there but it seemed to take away from the joke. Guess I should have. I thought the clearly would be enough
of a give away.

Ok then...

[Mister_Peace]

You can't have half a post be sarcastic and the other half be non-sarcastic unless you use /sarcasm off.

[uhgungawa]

You can't have half a post be sarcastic and the other half be non-sarcastic unless you use /sarcasm off.

/sarcasm off ¿

[LordPiglet]

So apparently it would also be an exploit to use ddoor in Titan green room according to some posters.

(consider the fact that certain doors never re-open, isn't it a bit of evidence that the use of door to bypass locked doors is something intentional from the devs?)

[HelvanderSeries6]

It's not an exploit, but there should be an incentive to kill them. Would be perfect with 2-3 chests that can appear in a random room after an illusion is killed, POP style.

/Agree

[voodoogroves]

It's not an exploit, but there should be an incentive to kill them. Would be perfect with 2-3 chests that can appear in a random room after an illusion is killed, POP style.

If you want folks to really put a wrinkle in that, give a small chance at a shard drop for specific items in the specific rooms.

And make the chance of a chest appearing increase based on the # of times you've killed him thusfar in the dungeon (to prevent single-area farming).

[dingal]

Has the exploit that allowed this thread to be created been fixed yet? I think it was the Post New Thread button or something. Nerf that thing. NERF IT HARD.

[Talon_Moonshadow]

So apparently it would also be an exploit to use door in Titan green room according to some posters.

(consider the fact that certain doors never re-open, isn't it a bit of evidence that the use of door to bypass locked doors is something intentional from the devs?)

/sigh

[Sirea]

consider the fact that certain doors never re-open

Not true.

[GotSomeQuestions]

If they're fine with Big Top, I can't imagine why they'd have a problem with ADQ1. Bypassing enemies using character abilities (spells/skills/gear) has always been a valid tactic, as long as the quest objectives permit it.

[NaturalHazard]

I suppose sneaking through Stealthy Repossession without killing anything is an exploit too? And the bonus XP you can get in quests for few or no kills is just a bug? Maybe you report every eChrono group you join that doesn't fully clear out all the mobs in the marketplace, including every orange named devil?

Most quests don't require you to kill every single monster along the way, nor should they. Using available tools to to provide multiple options on how to complete objectives is something that should be encouraged more, not less. This game is at least supposed to be based on D&D after all.

Not an exploit. If you want to kill the illusions, nothing is stopping you. Play it how you want, and stop trying to force your preferred method on everybody else.

^^^^ this.

[Gauthaag]

does anyone hear about Rest for Restless ddoor exploit? heh

[HelvanderSeries6]

Since we are on the topic. Can anyone tell me when the 'using a haggle 15 item' exploit will be fixed. /sarcasm off

[Scraap]

If history is any indication, they'll fix it the day before either I've enough plat to stock a reasonable amount of d-door scrolls from the auction house on my UMD characters, or they decide to start selling them from vendors again. (Seriously though, if the objection is that the tactic is limited to a pair of classes, why not advocate for making that more prevalent across the classes that logically should be able to pull it off, rather than gutting that bit of utility?)

[karl_k0ch]

If it would be considered to be an exploit to use DDoor, this thread would have been visited by the cube 2 days ago.