Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 40
  1. #1
    The Mad Multiclasser Failedlegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default Very Important Dev Post About U10.1

    Quote Originally Posted by MadFloyd View Post
    Everyone,

    The train has been stopped. The patch will not ship in its current state.

    I will update (probably via a separate thread) when I have more news, but I can say this:

    We will NOT require raid loot as ingredients.

    We will NOT require bound named items as ingredients.

    Many ingredients, and the *amount* of some of these ingredients were out of line.

    These changed recipes should have been reviewed by various designers, but weren't (a hole in our process that we have identified and corrected to avoid for the future).

    Mournlands did not have an opportunity to see or comment on these changes.

    Again, I'll post more info when I have it.

    Our sincere apologies for causing panic, and many thanks to all players who offered their well-thought out and constructive feedback on this issue and tried the changes on Lamannia.

    "MudFloyd"
    oh and lol he signed it Mud Floyd :P QFT
    Last edited by Failedlegend; 07-08-2011 at 03:17 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan
    There is little value in getting into an edition debate; as with anything, we create what we believe works best for DDO.

  2. #2
    Community Member Persiflage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Very, very happy about this. I mean, I'm still gonna make all the greater bane/holy burst shards I can manage, in case the new requirements are truly onerous, but I think stopping this patch going out is a real win for Turbine, the DDO community and the game itself. Well done!
    Crime in multi-storey car parks: it's wrong on so many levels.

  3. #3
    Community Member MaxwellEdison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Cross posting my response from the discussion thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxwellEdison View Post
    Thanks Mud, that was exactly the type of response I was hoping to see. I am still worried about tome usage in crafting (for anything other than ability raises higher than +6). And their inclusion will still lead me in the New Coke conspiracy direction. At least I still have *some* hope of getting 'decent' low and mid-level returning shurikens now.

  4. #4
    Community Member TheDjinnFor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    595

    Default

    tbqh I'm not satisfied with a 'some of the changes were not intentional'. Scrap all of the recipe changes; no tomes, no astral diamonds, no epic shards/tokens, no named items, no bound items, no shroud ingredients. There is no way I am going to use Firestorm Greaves to get Fire Absorption shards, but you notice how the greaves don't fall under any of the categories he listed?

    Change the recipes that there are issues with to require the 'Mystical' ingredients you get from high level packs (maybe even in high multiples); the addition of these ingredients to the end rewards of some quests could have been a non-intrusive way of checking the creation of powerful shards.
    Last edited by TheDjinnFor; 07-08-2011 at 12:15 PM.

  5. #5
    The Mad Multiclasser Failedlegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDjinnFor View Post
    There is no way I am going to use Firestorm Greaves to get Fire Absorption shards, but you notice how the greaves don't fall under any of the categories he listed?
    We will NOT require named items as ingredients. Greaves = named yes?
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan
    There is little value in getting into an edition debate; as with anything, we create what we believe works best for DDO.

  6. #6
    Community Member MaxwellEdison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Failedlegend View Post
    We will NOT require named items as ingredients. Greaves = named yes?
    Actually, the quote was

    We will NOT require bound named items as ingredients.

  7. #7
    Community Member RTN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    500

    Default

    What's the point of a beta/test server if they're not seeing the updates to, you know, test?

  8. #8
    Community Member LunaCee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Failedlegend View Post
    We will NOT require named items as ingredients. Greaves = named yes?
    Except for the fact that the exact wording is "Will not require BOUND named items."

    And since stuff like The Bloodstone, Firestorm Greaves, Ring of Spellstoring are UNBOUND named items... I still fear we may be in for some nasty surprises.

  9. #9
    The Mad Multiclasser Failedlegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RTN View Post
    What's the point of a beta/test server if they're not seeing the updates to, you know, test?
    If your refering to mournlands than read below

    Quote Originally Posted by MadFloyd View Post
    a hole in our process that we have identified and corrected to avoid for the future...Mournlands did not have an opportunity to see or comment on these changes.

    "MudFloyd"
    hehe mud....if your referring to lammania well obviously it was tested (by us) and halted which i have a feeling took alot of guts on madfloyds part and his superiors prob arn't to happy with him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan
    There is little value in getting into an edition debate; as with anything, we create what we believe works best for DDO.

  10. #10
    Community Member DarkSpectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    0

    Thumbs up

    This is great news given that the pros and cons were actually weighed in this matter.
    I am glad that Madfloyd and the others listened to many concerns from the DDO community on this.
    Also a big shout out to everyone in the community for voicing their concerns.

    That being said, what viable changes will be made in the future to improve and make crafting better?
    "Khyber Server" The Crown Jewel of DDO Main Alts. Darkelvis, Thickelvis, Almostelvis, Holyelvis, Lil-elvis

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RTN View Post
    What's the point of a beta/test server if they're not seeing the updates to, you know, test?
    Mournlands is not a test server, it is a first stage preview server.
    Lama is a 2nd stage preview server.

  12. #12
    The Mad Multiclasser Failedlegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    It would be nice if they said "Thanks for all the feedback we've decided too (insert madfloyd post here) but were also unlocked crafting so you can carft any effect on any item with some exceptions like no flaming burst or other attack properties on non-weapons and no guards on weapons...but shields can have anything since their considered to be a dual purpose equipment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordovan
    There is little value in getting into an edition debate; as with anything, we create what we believe works best for DDO.

  13. #13
    Community Member RTN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    500

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missing_Minds View Post
    Mournlands is not a test server, it is a first stage preview server.
    Lama is a 2nd stage preview server.
    In either case, not showing these things to that private audience first is ridiculous.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RTN View Post
    In either case, not showing these things to that private audience first is ridiculous.
    I'm not about to disagree with that.

  15. #15
    Community Member Garix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RTN View Post
    What's the point of a beta/test server if they're not seeing the updates to, you know, test?
    I suspect that Mournlands is mainly used for the initial feedback on gameplay changes. These crafting changes never changed the mechanics of gameplay, it would of just changed how the game would be played (no more loot put up for roll etc).

    Very happy to see the post from MadFloyd. Nice to see that we do get listened to on occasions.
    Leader of Shrodingers Cat Support Group a Husband and Wife guild on Orien.
    Tolkiens Law: Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.
    Dresdens corollary:
    Screw subtle!

  16. #16
    Community Member Cauthey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,976

    Default

    Someone used the Altar of Dev Appeasement!! And it WORKED!! Hurray!!


    http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=328291

  17. #17
    Community Member Alektronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    438

    Default

    What if they kept the same recipes for unbound shards? We still get to make our own stuff for a "fair" price, but the price of unbound shards would be.... ghastly.
    -Thelanis toons- Alektronic (wolf), Bakeneko (monk), Ghyldra (druid), Hermeros (crafter), Lecker (wf wiz),
    Panaceus (elemental barb), Quallus (SDK), Taigong (acrobat), Vamprix (warlock), Vercigetorix (bard)

  18. #18
    Community Member Talon_Moonshadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    9,033

    Default

    /cheer
    I gave up a life of farming to become an Adventurer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jandric View Post
    ..., but I honestly think the solution is to group with less whiny people.

  19. #19
    Community Member dragons1ayer74's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alektronic View Post
    What if they kept the same recipes for unbound shards? We still get to make our own stuff for a "fair" price, but the price of unbound shards would be.... ghastly.
    Keep the same price no. Have varying costs yes.

    IMO the best bound shards should be attainable at a moderate cost. The best unbound shards should be attainable at a high cost.

    The overall system is likely somewhat broken though really it is too much grind to get your crafting level up and then too powerful once it is that high. It should be balanced with easier ways to level but have higher costs on desired items.

  20. #20
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    bump. the panic threads are still sitting at the top of the list... just want to make sure this doesn't drop off the front page.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload