Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 49
  1. #1
    Community Member barryman5000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    263

    Default Savant debuff no longer stacks

    Saw this on the release notes and immediately tested it. Debuffs no longer stack.

    I understand the reasoning. . . . but if you go ahead with this can we get a much shorter cool down on the debuff? Kinda useless to debuff and wait 20 seconds.

  2. #2
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    If it will no longer stack, you should be able to debuff more than one mob quickly, with a 3-5 second cooldown on the curse.
    Blind Faith

    Noheels,Ravenwind-Sarlona,FirstOfOne,Kraagg

  3. #3
    Community Member barryman5000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Yeah, my thinking is if we can't use it to overpower a boss with stacking debuffs then at least make it somewhat useful for trash. I can kill most things in 5 seconds and with a 30 second cool down for a measly 15% extra damage . . .

  4. #4
    Community Member Aaxeyu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Awesome!

    A lower cooldown would be nice indeed.

  5. #5
    Bwest Fwiends Memnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    .
    .
    .

    .
    .
    .

    ...sigh.
    Exit, pursued by a bear. ~ William Shakespeare (stage direction from The Winter's Tale)

    .60284.

  6. #6
    Community Member Kza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    929

    Default

    This was good and needed imho. A shorter cooldown can be ok now imho. (And even funnier for savants)

  7. #7
    Community Member Trillea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Horrid choice here Devs. Absolutely horrid. Makes the PrE completely unappealing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Philam View Post
    I nominate you as head developer of DDO!
    Quote Originally Posted by FlimsyFirewood View Post
    That tears it. I need to get a donkey.
    Concentrated power is the enemy of liberty - Ronald Reagan

  8. #8
    Community Member Aaxeyu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trillea View Post
    Horrid choice here Devs. Absolutely horrid. Makes the PrE completely unappealing.
    I disagree. Now the PrEs are more balanced to eachother (and to other classes). The SLAs alone makes the PrEs awesome.

  9. #9
    Community Member B0ltdrag0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Memnir View Post
    [COLOR="Black"].
    .
    .

    ...sigh.
    QFT sir. QFT.
    Officer of Renowned

  10. #10
    Community Member Trillea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aaxeyu View Post
    I disagree. Now the PrEs are more balanced to eachother (and to other classes). The SLAs alone makes the PrEs awesome.
    No. They don't.

    If they had chosen better spells for the SLA's then they would. The SLA's should have been (IMO)

    Cold:
    1)Niacs
    2)Frost Lance
    3)Otilukes

    Fire:
    1)Burning Hands
    2)Fireball
    3)the new Wall of Fire, complete with all the nerfs.

    Acid:
    1)Acid Spray
    2)Acid Blast
    3)Acid Rain, remove the recent nerf

    Lightning:
    1)Shocking Grasp
    2)Lightning Bolt
    3)Ball Lightning

    And make the cooldowns 1, 2, and 4 seconds for each tier, with the debuff stacking 3 times max.
    Quote Originally Posted by Philam View Post
    I nominate you as head developer of DDO!
    Quote Originally Posted by FlimsyFirewood View Post
    That tears it. I need to get a donkey.
    Concentrated power is the enemy of liberty - Ronald Reagan

  11. #11
    Community Member Aaxeyu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trillea View Post
    No. They don't.

    If they had chosen better spells for the SLA's then they would. The SLA's should have been (IMO)

    Cold:
    1)Niacs
    2)Frost Lance
    3)Otilukes

    Fire:
    1)Burning Hands
    2)Fireball
    3)the new Wall of Fire, complete with all the nerfs.

    Acid:
    1)Acid Spray
    2)Acid Blast
    3)Acid Rain, remove the recent nerf

    Lightning:
    1)Shocking Grasp
    2)Lightning Bolt
    3)Ball Lightning

    And make the cooldowns 1, 2, and 4 seconds for each tier, with the debuff stacking 3 times max.
    That would not have been balanced at all.

  12. #12
    Community Member Chai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,045

    Default

    Rofl. Its almost better now to just go DC and spell pen to make sure those mass holds land, which ramps damage up more than anything else these PREs are providing. We dont need more bonus for trash. We already have that in the helpless state change. We need to be able to DPS bosses better.

    I might not even have to LR, as I will be doing the exact same thing after U9 as I was before U9 on my caster. I just might drop an extra nuke or two afterward due to the damage increase.

    Thanks for the convenience of not having to respec. No thanks for the PRE if it goes live this way. Sure sorcs will still out damage wizards, but not to the same level of impact that wizards having higher DCs has.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teh_Troll View Post
    We are no more d000m'd then we were a week ago. Note - This was posted in 10/2013 (when concurrency was ~4x what it is today)

  13. #13
    Community Member Trillea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chai View Post
    rofl. Its Almost Better Now To Just Go Dc And Spell Pen To Make Sure Those Mass Holds Land, Which Ramps Damage Up More Than Anything Else These Pres Are Providing. We Dont Need More Bonus For Trash. We Already Have That In The Helpless State Change. We Need To Be Able To Dps Bosses Better.

    I Might Not Even Have To Lr, As I Will Be Doing The Exact Same Thing After U9 As I Was Before U9 On My Caster. I Just Might Drop An Extra Nuke Or Two Afterward Due To The Damage Increase.

    Thanks For The Convenience Of Not Having To Respec. No Thanks For The Pre If It Goes Live This Way. Sure Sorcs Will Still Out Damage Wizards, But Not To The Same Level Of Impact That Wizards Having Higher Dcs Has.
    /qft
    Quote Originally Posted by Philam View Post
    I nominate you as head developer of DDO!
    Quote Originally Posted by FlimsyFirewood View Post
    That tears it. I need to get a donkey.
    Concentrated power is the enemy of liberty - Ronald Reagan

  14. #14
    Bwest Fwiends Memnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai View Post
    No thanks for the PRE if it goes live this way. Sure sorcs will still out damage wizards, but not to the same level of impact that wizards having higher DCs has.
    Agreed.

    I had a Sorc all ready to go for the new Update. Now, since the Savant PrEs are all more weighted towards being punitive and negatively impacting the Sorc - I think I'm just going to scrap it and use these 10% XP days to level up a Wizard instead.


    PrE's should benefit the character more then harm it. And that is no longer the case with Savant. But, thank you Turbine for gutting this PrE in advance. Now I won't have to enjoy the PrE and then have it hamstrung a few months down the line. Saved me a lot of time and trouble by doing it now.
    Exit, pursued by a bear. ~ William Shakespeare (stage direction from The Winter's Tale)

    .60284.

  15. #15
    Community Member Cyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,362

    Default

    A 15% short term debuff on a Sorc is better then something similar on a monk, but it is still nothing to write home about. The curse was the backbone of the new savant lines. Taking away 80% of it's power is very signifigant...so signifigant that it is appalling that they would have gotten this close to release and then decide it was that unbalanced.
    Proud Recipient of At least 8 Negative Rep From NA Threads.
    Main: Sharess
    Alts: Avaril/Cyr/Cyrillia/Garagos/Inim/Lamasa/Ravella

  16. #16
    Community Member Trillea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Memnir View Post
    Agreed.

    I had a Sorc all ready to go for the new Update. Now, since the Savant PrEs are all more weighted towards being punitive and negatively impacting the Sorc - I think I'm just going to scrap it and use these 10% XP days to level up a Wizard instead.


    PrE's should benefit the character more then harm it. And that is no longer the case with Savant.
    I feel your pain. I have been busting my rear off trying to get my sorc TR'd through 2 wizard lives (500k XP to go to finish the 2nd) in order to be able to take full advantage of this new PrE on day 1 of release to live. It is the one that I have been looking forward to for a LONG time - the spell damage based PrE. I have multiple wizards of various flavors that work well, but this character is my main. She has all my best gear and is extremely durable, and is my favorite character by far. She has both the ice savant ring and belt, and I was planning on going that route, or possibly acid.

    But as things stand currently for this PrE, it is not worth taking in its current form, leaving me EXTREMELY disappointed. FIX IT TURBINE!
    Quote Originally Posted by Philam View Post
    I nominate you as head developer of DDO!
    Quote Originally Posted by FlimsyFirewood View Post
    That tears it. I need to get a donkey.
    Concentrated power is the enemy of liberty - Ronald Reagan

  17. #17
    Community Member Arctigis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,686

    Default

    The curse in it's initial form was OP. However, they (once again) have gone too far IMO. 15% vulnerability
    doesn't cover the DC deficit between Sorc and Wizard on reflex save spells.

  18. #18
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyr View Post
    A 15% short term debuff on a Sorc is better then something similar on a monk, but it is still nothing to write home about. The curse was the backbone of the new savant lines. Taking away 80% of it's power is very signifigant...so signifigant that it is appalling that they would have gotten this close to release and then decide it was that unbalanced.
    Yep, i think the curse should be an AOE spell with a duration of 30 seconds and a cooldown of 10 seconds.
    Last edited by Mjesko; 04-14-2011 at 12:41 PM.

  19. #19
    Community Member Alanim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    309

    Default

    Also as stated above, a 3x stacking of the curse wouldn't be over-powered and could possibly nerf it to where turbine wants it to be, while still making it acceptable for the players.(also the AoE idea above sounds like it could be appealing).

  20. #20
    Community Member InSoNiAc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    36

    Default

    NEW (Lammania Only): The Savant prestige enhancement "Awaken Elemental Weakness" abilities no longer stack.
    My personal feeling is that while the original implementation was indeed a very powerful ability, that power was balanced by the time required for a single caster to build-up a full power stack and the attention required to maintain it. If the feeling was that this ability was overpowered then why not:
    (1) Reduce the number of times that the ability stacks with an associated reduction in the cooldown
    (2) Eliminate stacking altogether but make the percentage higher (say 50%) with an appropriately shorter duration and cooldown

    Feldir 18 Paladin / 2 Monk, Feldor 20 Bugged, Feldur 12 Monk / 6 Fighter / 2 Paladin (main), Feldyr 20 FvS, Silverbeard 20 PM, Strontium 20 Fire Savant
    To Hit Armor Class Zero - Ghallanda

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload