GS blanks service

[Thaxlsillyia]

GS blanks of your choice.

Planned charge-
1funk jobs: 1 large devil scale (tips appreciated)
2funk-2twig jobs: 1 large devil scale+extra loving*
3funk/3twig jobs: 2 large devil scales

Happy to listen to your proposition and offers if you don't want to go with above deal. Will accept payment in plats/dragon sclaes(white or blue)/major sp pots/boot ingridients/ "random nice stuff" in any combination of your choice.

*extra loving - base ingridients or large ingid (stone/chain/arrow/sharpie) or major sp pots or dragon scales or good ole plats. Fancy named items (black widow eye/popX/optic nerve/etc etc) will be accepted as payment.

Some wait time involved. But should be able to get things moving fast enough ( i like doing things outside the Vale too)

[Gratan]

GS blanks of your choice.

hope this is legal... any input from legal department welcome. (have a nagging feeling the previous ear slug farmer was taken to the headmasters office)

I am sure it was for something else. It would not be the first time for him. What you have planned and the farm service he was doing is just fine. If either was trying to get real life money for your services then that is where you would get into trouble with turbine.

[Lithic]

hope this is legal... any input from legal department welcome. (have a nagging feeling the previous ear slug farmer was taken to the headmasters office)

I had a greensteel store myself for almost a year with no issues. Just dont try to get real cash for em.

[Thaxlsillyia]

I had a greensteel store myself for almost a year with no issues. Just dont try to get real cash for em.

so do you think the prices are fair?

[Lorien_the_First_One]

One earslug farmer was offering to give a bound to character item to players not in quest at time of completion. That's a no-no.

Trading unbound/tradable items for other unbound/tradable items is just fine.

[skepticalsoul]

One earslug farmer was offering to give a bound to character item to players not in quest at time of completion. That's a no-no.

Trading unbound/tradable items for other unbound/tradable items is just fine.

There is nothing in the CoC which says this is a not allowed. Please know what you're talking about before you start making accusations. It was a perfectly legal form of exchange and many people were satisfied with the service. Saying slanderous things like this just tarnishes your reputation, not theirs.

At any rate, the going rate for blanks is 1-2 large devil scales. isn't it? Last I checked it was, anyhow but I'm not 100% sure.

[Thaxlsillyia]

thanks for the clarification. redone the prices. now order that green steel item you always wanted!!!

[Lorien_the_First_One]

There is nothing in the CoC which says this is a not allowed. Please know what you're talking about before you start making accusations. It was a perfectly legal form of exchange and many people were satisfied with the service. Saying slanderous things like this just tarnishes your reputation, not theirs.

At any rate, the going rate for blanks is 1-2 large devil scales. isn't it? Last I checked it was, anyhow but I'm not 100% sure.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. It's a listed exploit from dev provided examples:
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=172475

"The following activities are considered to be violations of the Terms of Service:

Using any method to loot a chest or accept quest reward with any character who did not complete the related quest objective from start to finish. "

The chest was looted, and the ear bug killed, and then you invited someone in who did not complete the related quest objective, he just picked up the loot. It's an exploit, clear and obvious. Please know what you are talking about before you advise people to do things that violate the TOS and could get them banned/suspended.

wont your logic make in-chest trade of binding items illegal? anyway. thanks for the clarification. redone my price lists. GS orders plz...

Nope, because those people were in quest when the objective was completed.

[skepticalsoul]

I know exactly what I'm talking about. It's a listed exploit from dev provided examples:
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=172475

"The following activities are considered to be violations of the Terms of Service:

Using any method to loot a chest or accept quest reward with any character who did not complete the related quest objective from start to finish. "

The chest was looted, and the ear bug killed, and then you invited someone in who did not complete the related quest objective, he just picked up the loot. It's an exploit, clear and obvious. Please know what you are talking about before you advise people to do things that violate the TOS and could get them banned/suspended.



Nope, because those people were in quest when the objective was completed.

The eardweller is neither in the chest, nor a quest reward. If that were the case farming any chest in any quest without completing it would be illegal. Your logic is illogical. Also I'm pretty sure that the exploit you're referring to is for quest specific items such as raid rewards (does anyone actually know why there is a barrier in the reaver?), or items that drop upon quest completion. However it's left deliberately vague so that GMs have some leeway. It sounds like you're just grasping for straws though to be honest. :/

Edit: lol neg rep for disagreeing with you? Now you're REALLY grasping at straws.

[Carpone]

I know exactly what I'm talking about. It's a listed exploit from dev provided examples:
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=172475

"The following activities are considered to be violations of the Terms of Service:

Using any method to loot a chest or accept quest reward with any character who did not complete the related quest objective from start to finish. "

By that definition, inviting someone mid-quest to replace someone that disconnected is against the ToS. That's preposterous.

Turbine also isn't enforcing these rules. If they were, then anyone who has ever ransacked epic ADQ or epic VON2/4 for seals would be banned (read: the majority of people with epic DQ/VON items). Rules without enforcement = worthless.

[SEMPER]

its usually 1 large scale and maybe a stone or shrapnel but thats about it , 2 large scales is robbery

[Jahmin]

It sounds like you're just grasping for straws though to be honest. :/

Edit: lol neg rep for disagreeing with you? Now you're REALLY grasping at straws.

He is grasping... unsuccessfully mind you

One earslug farmer was offering to give a bound to character item to players not in quest at time of completion. That's a no-no.

Utterly false

I know exactly what I'm talking about.

No, you do not

[Thaxlsillyia]

its usually 1 large scale and maybe a stone or shrapnel but thats about it , 2 large scales is robbery

I fixed my prices based on previous posts here. The 2 scale is just for very specific items. The run of the mill stuff is still one scale +large. But also note that this is off-set by the fact that i just charge 1 scale (and not scale + stone) for a some items.

If you need something with 3 funks and you feel you have a fair deal send a pm. It will most probably be done. if you have a spare funk that will work too. badly in need of scales

[Thaxlsillyia]

thanks for all the orders. Have a bit of waiting list. Will start taking more orders once I finish these

[SEMPER]

pm sent

[toughguyjoe]

By that definition, inviting someone mid-quest to replace someone that disconnected is against the ToS. That's preposterous.

I can see turbine not enforcing such rules in that instance.....however...

I may have seen people do everything but finish Choronoscope and then suddenly lots of people go link dead, and then...you know...

[Dartwick]

The eardweller is neither in the chest, nor a quest reward. If that were the case farming any chest in any quest without completing it would be illegal. Your logic is illogical. Also I'm pretty sure that the exploit you're referring to is for quest specific items such as raid rewards (does anyone actually know why there is a barrier in the reaver?), or items that drop upon quest completion. However it's left deliberately vague so that GMs have some leeway. It sounds like you're just grasping for straws though to be honest. :/

Edit: lol neg rep for disagreeing with you? Now you're REALLY grasping at straws.

Technically he is correct.

But in weird rule situations like this we all know that GMs tend to make up new rules so I wouldnt depend on anything.