Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 120

Thread: Add Heal Threat

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Community Member weyoun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default Add Heal Threat

    Say wouldn't heal threat be nice? At least with average intelligence mobs. With quickened mass heal completely OP a little heal threat could even things out? Oh and put a 2 min CD on mana pots too.

    Thanks!
    Lysol, Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

  2. #2
    Community Member grodon9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    8,517

    Default

    Though I'm not a big fan of heal-threat (my poor little halfling Cleric . . .) I LOVE the idea of an SP-pot cool-down. Sure it'd lead to more wipes, but if it does lead to a wipe you SHOULD have failed. Drinking your way through a quest shouldn't be a viable strategy.

  3. #3
    The Hatchery Nospheratus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    835

    Default

    /signed for the pot cooldown


    Realistically though, it won't happen because those are sold in the store!..
    R.I.P. Devourer - 20-Aug-2010 11:00 GMT(+1 DST)
    (World Broadcast): World broadcast: 'Farewell to all our loyal players and thank you for your time in Eberron. We wish you all the best for your future adventures. Please log out now as the servers are now going down. Many thanks, Codemasters Online.'

  4. #4
    Community Member weyoun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Whether you're a fan of heal threat or not, its one of the things that makes the DDO AI flat. I mean, many of the monsters are supposed to be these uber war generals and yet they aren't smart enough to attack the healer? Doesn't really make a lot of sense does it?
    Lysol, Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

  5. #5
    Community Member grodon9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    8,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weyoun View Post
    Whether you're a fan of heal threat or not, its one of the things that makes the DDO AI flat. I mean, many of the monsters are supposed to be these uber war generals and yet they aren't smart enough to attack the healer? Doesn't really make a lot of sense does it?
    Not at all, but the encounters as they are now are balanced around NOT having healing generating any threat. A change this big would require much greater changes than just that.

    Let me rephrase . . . I'm against heal-threat in a vacuum. If encounters were re-tooled and this was a part of a much larger holistic change than I'd be fine with it.

  6. #6
    Community Member Samadhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grodon9999 View Post
    Not at all, but the encounters as they are now are balanced around NOT having healing generating any threat. A change this big would require much greater changes than just that.

    Let me rephrase . . . I'm against heal-threat in a vacuum. If encounters were re-tooled and this was a part of a much larger holistic change than I'd be fine with it.
    Sensible. A flat change would be too drastic; or minimal enough to not even be worth bothering with.
    sravana, kirtana, smarana, dasya, atma-nivedana
    ...NAMASTE...

  7. #7
    Community Member weyoun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grodon9999 View Post
    Not at all, but the encounters as they are now are balanced around NOT having healing generating any threat. A change this big would require much greater changes than just that.

    Let me rephrase . . . I'm against heal-threat in a vacuum. If encounters were re-tooled and this was a part of a much larger holistic change than I'd be fine with it.
    That's what I'm advocating. The complete lack of heal threat is silly, to put it lightly.
    Lysol, Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

  8. #8
    Community Member Illiain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    567

    Default

    In general, I think this would be a horrible idea. The NPCs have odd movement patterns that the players can't prevent. They slide down the hall after getting tripped, they run around when blinded and stunned/danced/etc, they can sidestep around you after taking a full TWF flurry for 75% of their total hps in damage. Basically, if they want to get around you, they will get around you before your computer can react.

    It would make preventing them from going after the healer almost impossible after their first mass cure/heal, not to mention overheals. How would that be dealt with? Would it tally damage healed or total heal? Hitting the human monk with past life paladin and critting for 1500-2k would be a huge about of hate, when they were probably only down 200-300hps. This leads to healers being stingy with their less efficient single target heals and a lot more party deaths.

    Now personally, I would enjoy it. I'm currently reequiping my old revamped battlecleric into an intimicleric. Raid heals and tanking in a single party slot. But not everyone has a build that can deal with that kind of abuse and you'd have weenie healbots dead all over the place.

  9. #9
    Community Member grodon9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    8,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Illiain View Post
    Now personally, I would enjoy it. I'm currently reequiping my old revamped battlecleric into an intimicleric. Raid heals and tanking in a single party slot. But not everyone has a build that can deal with that kind of abuse and you'd have weenie healbots dead all over the place.
    LOL, that's AWESOME. We have a couple intimitank-FvS on Ghallanda who'd LOVE this change.

  10. #10
    Community Member Jamma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weyoun View Post
    Whether you're a fan of heal threat or not, its one of the things that makes the DDO AI flat. I mean, many of the monsters are supposed to be these uber war generals and yet they aren't smart enough to attack the healer? Doesn't really make a lot of sense does it?
    I've been in many parties where the melees don't take out the healers, because they're in the back and not noticed, or the melees just figure they'll get to them eventually. Hmm, sounds like Turbine modeled the monster AI after player AI.

    Seriously, if you want to talk 'smart' thing for the monsters to do, eliminate all hate mechanics. Just give them a pecking order:

    1) attack all healers till healers are dead
    2) attack all casters till casters are dead
    3) mop up incidental melees, preferably before your break enchantment/ mass hold persons wears off on them.

  11. #11
    Community Member grodon9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    8,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamma View Post
    I've been in many parties where the melees don't take out the healers, because they're in the back and not noticed, or the melees just figure they'll get to them eventually. Hmm, sounds like Turbine modeled the monster AI after player AI.

    Seriously, if you want to talk 'smart' thing for the monsters to do, eliminate all hate mechanics. Just give them a pecking order:

    1) attack all healers till healers are dead
    2) attack all casters till casters are dead
    3) mop up incidental melees, preferably before your break enchantment/ mass hold persons wears off on them.
    Again, we could exploit the hell of of this. If we know the pecking order you can shield-wall around it and beat the mobs down without taking any damage. it'd be worse (easier) than we have now. I'm not even gonna mention what you could do with BB-kiting if the divines have auto-agro.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weyoun View Post
    Whether you're a fan of heal threat or not, its one of the things that makes the DDO AI flat. I mean, many of the monsters are supposed to be these uber war generals and yet they aren't smart enough to attack the healer? Doesn't really make a lot of sense does it?
    Play a bard. Tell me you aren't picked out first. *grumbles* 2 rooms back/hidden and I'm still targeted first!

  13. #13
    Community Member weyoun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missing_Minds View Post
    Play a bard. Tell me you aren't picked out first. *grumbles* 2 rooms back/hidden and I'm still targeted first!
    My toons are public, I have 3 bards.
    Lysol, Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

  14. #14
    Community Member Illiain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missing_Minds View Post
    Play a bard. Tell me you aren't picked out first. *grumbles* 2 rooms back/hidden and I'm still targeted first!
    I have a WC bard with ranger splash TWF khopesh. They walk around me to get to the casters and I use intim. They must pick the person with the lowest kills.

    As for the AI, if it was fixed, we'd never be able to intim/hate tank. Why would anything target the best defended, or the guy with the biggest axe, instead of hitting the squishy casters and healers. Every raid/epic raid in the game would start with the healers being one shotted with disints/meteor swarms.

    Once support is dead, melee is just a sack of declining hps. Some just do it faster than others.

    Some things, which being more realistic, would make the game unplayable if implemented.

  15. #15
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grodon9999 View Post
    Drinking your way through a quest shouldn't be a viable strategy.
    Don't be silly. I drink my way through every quest and it works great until I pass out.
    Best Quote Ever:
    Quote Originally Posted by Heronous View Post
    The clam can not be ransacked.
    Proud Member and occasional Officer of Identity Unknown (Argonnessen)

  16. #16
    Community Member stoolcannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grodon9999 View Post
    Though I'm not a big fan of heal-threat (my poor little halfling Cleric . . .) I LOVE the idea of an SP-pot cool-down. Sure it'd lead to more wipes, but if it does lead to a wipe you SHOULD have failed. Drinking your way through a quest shouldn't be a viable strategy.
    I think this would be reasonable actually. Much harder but very reasonable.
    Captain's Crew: (TR) Dingalbarian - Horc Barb20 - THF, Dingaladin - Human 18/2 Paladin/Monk - TWF, Lamepolicy - Squishy Drow - Wiz20 Archmage

  17. #17
    Community Member Ethiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    58

    Default

    unless they can apply the threat equally to Reconstruct, WF become godkings again.
    “Don't be buffaloed by experts and elites. Experts often possess more data than judgment. Elites can become so inbred that they produce haemophiliacs who bleed to death as soon as they are nicked by the real world.” General Colin Powell

  18. #18
    Community Member weyoun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ethiel View Post
    unless they can apply the threat equally to Reconstruct, WF become godkings again.
    I didn't consider that. But it should work the same way - it should be an evaluation that the monster does when he detects the PC's HP increase. The greater the increase, the greater the heal threat. So healing / reconing someone from incapped to full health should be a huge heal threat. Again mass heals should = mass agro.
    Lysol, Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

  19. #19
    Community Member BananaHat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    130

    Default

    I welcome heal threat with my WF FvS. I can often handle incoming damage better than other party members due to my high DR, high HP, guards, and the fact that I am the closest one to my own healing and I can't get blocked by an object from myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eladrin
    I've never seen someone at a tabletop game say "I jump up on the wall until I get stuck in a spot where I can hit the giant but he can't hit me back for no apparent reason."

  20. #20
    Community Member sephiroth1084's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    7,412

    Default

    This is definitely a reasonable solution to the problem we have currently, where healing is much too powerful and aggro management of major foes is usually too straightforward.

    Eladrin, since you've poked your head in here, could you also consider giving major monsters (ie. raid bosses) some new attacks that they can use to get out of the beat-on-the-boss huddle? Arretrikos in Shroud 5 has gotten the ability to teleport members or himself on occasion, and Suulomaedes teleports around in VoD, but Harry doesn't do much of anything in Shroud 4, barely does enough in Shroud 5, and Lailat, Horoth, ToD-Sulu and Nythirios don't do much of anything either.

    The Judge's wingbeat serves this purporse, but due to the degree of its effect and design of the room, that attack is actually more dangerous on elite than almost anything else in the raid. It is also very annoying. And if his wings are so powerful, why isn't he flying? Kind of hoping that since you've discovered the tech to make real flying monsters (the Abishai in Chrono), maybe we'll see more encounters with truer 3D combat.
    Useful links: A Guide to Using a Gamepad w/ DDO / All Caster Shroud, Hard Shroud, VoD, ToD Einhander, Elochka, Ferrumrym, Ferrumdermis, Ferrumshot, Ferrumblood, Ferrumender, Ferrumshadow, Ferrumschtik All proud officers of The Loreseekers. Except Bruucelee, he's a Sentinel!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload