Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Community Member dragoninfernoblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11

    Default pale master vs archmage?

    which is better?
    If it moves kill it, if it doesn't move find a way to kill it, if you cant kill it, then just through the d*** thing and walk away.

  2. #2
    Community Member k1ngp1n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Depends (tm)

    Personally, I'm a fan of both for leveling. Pale Master, is, IMO, far inferior for Epic play though.
    Sarlona: Riyana | Ilyrae | Elaeria | Arlayh | Aryis | Lyanis | Yaera | Kyilsi | Malitae | Niariel | Laeriya
    'Polluting Sarlona with gimpy elves since 2009.'
    Endgame

  3. #3
    Community Member dogpig00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    301

    Default

    sorc is better

  4. #4
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    494

    Default

    As it stands right now wiz are better than sorcs and archmage is far better than pale master in terms of epic content. Using 3 mana web and 1 mana hypno in epics, as well as a very high mass hold DC makes archmage the best for epics.

  5. #5
    Community Member hyenaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default

    I am not having any trouble using my WF Pale master in Epics. He was an arcane for a while and then switched to Pale master for some other content. As far as my build went which was my first Wizard he has had no trouble in Epics and doing damage and holding monsters.

  6. #6

    Default

    I have a 20th level AM (ench) and a 18/2 wiz/rog PM And i feel that the PM is stronger. Sure the holds are not as high as the AM but can the PM gives 110% during the run. My AM on the other hand holds and waits to hold again.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload