Character build names are corny

[Bobthesponge]

Use of corny (and ungrammatical) language such as "OMG", " why are like all" and "w/e" disqualify you from criticizing and making fun of the way other people use language.

+1 sir. ha ha.

[LeslieWest_GuitarGod]

Ohh noes!

Just one question comes to mind here... Have you even SEEN the inside of a fifth grade classroom yet?

[WestportStan]

Ohh noes! people making fun of my forum name! Well i didnt come up with it and i have no idea *** it means ether and i would change it if there was such an option.



And as far as language... should i sound like Kelsey Grammer in "Frasier"? Concidering english isnt even my native i think i do pretty good.

Whoa. Easy now
There is no reason to drag 'Frasier' in to this.

[sigtrent]

Because its hard to name builds...
You want something memorable...
That hopefully tells you a bit about what the build is...
And because word play tends to come naturally to folks.

I groan at some of my own build names, others I really like.

It is true that a good build name will help you get more favorable responses to the build and a really boring one is more likely to be ignored entirely.

[LeslieWest_GuitarGod]

It is true that a good build name will help you get more favorable responses to the build and a really boring one is more likely to be ignored entirely.

I totally agree. Must say though, regardless of the names you chose, you've always put a great deal of thought and style to your character creations.

Just be careful in here, cause I think the OP just wants someone to "Twizzle his 'Nizzle"

[Razcar]

The build names are supposed to be fun and silly, it's a time-honoured tradition. I'm quite proud myself for naming my basic, vanilla DPS rogue build "Vanillah Killah".

[Pwesiela]

I happen to like my Warder, thank you very much! And happen to believe that it fits the build exactly, since, you know, he's as close to a Warder as i could get.

[Consumer]

Seeing as most build names describe their capabilities I see no problem.

The problem comes when a someone without a 2006 join date tries to name a build and fails miserably. I've always put plain names on my builds for this reason, I get neg repped enough as it is.

[QuantumFX]

I happen to like my Warder, thank you very much! And happen to believe that it fits the build exactly, since, you know, he's as close to a Warder as i could get.

I don’t think that’s the kind of name the OP was aiming at. Now, if you named the build “Ward Cleaver” then there could be a problem…

[Pwesiela]

I don’t think that’s the kind of name the OP was aiming at. Now, if you named the build “Ward Cleaver” then there could be a problem…

Maybe I should have gone with Waden, that way, I could have at least gone for some S&M allusion that the OP talks about.

[Teldurn]

I don’t think that’s the kind of name the OP was aiming at. Now, if you named the build “Ward Cleaver” then there could be a problem…

Ward Cleaver sounds like a name you'd give to a buffing damage machine build. Not to mention 'lulz double entendre".

[QuantumFX]

Ward Cleaver sounds like a name you'd give to a buffing damage machine build. Not to mention 'lulz double entendre".

While I could explain all the double entendre surrounding a TV show named “Leave it to Beaver” I’m not sure the post would be Cube proof… if you know what I mean.