eheheheh... five levels of fighter =) he's gonna love that fifth level, im telling you. Did you know that sometimes the Devs give a special bonus to awesome players, and those players get THREE free feats at fighter level five?
eheheheh... five levels of fighter =) he's gonna love that fifth level, im telling you. Did you know that sometimes the Devs give a special bonus to awesome players, and those players get THREE free feats at fighter level five?
Nah I ran into four reactions why they don't use Errata, first one believes that the Errata is stupid and could do a better job (such splitting Natural spell into feat or removing it, among some possible house rules). Meanwhile an other if you bring it up the players and believe it's just rules lawering. The third reaction Errata is that they hate "nerfs" to classes or hate having "over balancing" (aka 4E's approach) and just request you don't break the game. The last is that they rather not worry about carrying so many books or being force to search for "obscure" rules, and to them the Errata you have to look up the rule and then check the Errata to see if that rule was changed. The fourth group would rather just check the book what's printed or go with that.
Be careful what you say and how you say, especially when you add lib details. It come back and bite you...