Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default Thinking outside the square

    Here i was the other day on my new char, barb/ftr/rogue, lvl 5 and i saw an lfm up for a gwylans group 5-8. A couple of things struck my eye. One was "no noobs", another was "need hard/elite opener", third thing was, needed rogue or pally. As i have maxed rogue skills, i applied for the job. I got declined. When i asked why, the response was, "yeah as if you will be able to do the traps with one lvl of rogue".

    Now i refer back to the comment "no noobs". Unless the game has changed drastically, you can open quests on hard right off the bat, been that way for a couple of years. Additionally the comment about not being able to do the traps purely because of 1 lvl of rogue. My 1 lvl of rogue has the same trapsmithing abilities as a full class lvl 5 rogue.

    I reached the conclusion that the party leader shouldve excluded themselves from the group as they didnt want any noobs.

    Is this the current state of the game, that people cant think beyond the standard classes, or that they lack the social skills to ask, rather than just blanket decline.

    When i have applied for groups with my fighter/ranger/rogue i have been asked if i can do the rogue stuff, to which i usually either reply "yes" and explain my abilities, or if im being a bit sarcastic, i will ask them if they can do what their class is supposed to, this often meets with a laugh and acceptance into the group.

    Whilst i realise that a lot of classes MC with rogue or monk for evasion and dont take rogue skills, i have also come across a lot of full class rogues that dont take the basics, proclaimining to be "combat" rogues.

    To cap it off, they proceeded to take into their group a lvl 8 wiz/rogue and you guessed it, 1 lvl of rogue.

  2. #2
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    57

    Default

    This is basic human nature. People are stupid. Including you and I . Being 21, I have learned that over the years.

  3. #3
    Community Member Visty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    you can open quests on hard right off the bat, been that way for a couple of years.
    would call 8-9 months "years"
    Love Life of an Ooze: One ooze. Idiot hits ooze. Two oozes.
    0
    *insert axe*
    o o

  4. #4
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iBrute View Post
    This is basic human nature. People are stupid. Including you and I . Being 21, I have learned that over the years.
    Lol, i am 21 too, have been for a few years, i learnt 4 and 1/2 years ago i was stupid, others had been telling me for years but i was too stupid to listen

  5. #5
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Sorry, i didnt read your whole post.. I was chuckling too much with the thread title.

    Some day, you will make it all the way to the box, grasshopper, and then the lessons can begin.

  6. #6
    Community Member Eladiun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    Now i refer back to the comment "no noobs". Unless the game has changed drastically, you can open quests on hard right off the bat, been that way for a couple of years.

    I believe only P2P/VIP players have that option but otherwise your on the mark about any LFM that says no Noobs, Vets tend to sat KYW or BYOH subtle difference allows you to differentiate. As for getting declined by idiots just deal with it, it's a fact of life...find another party or start your own.
    Last edited by Eladiun; 05-26-2010 at 12:59 PM.
    “If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do succeed.”

  7. #7
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Visty View Post
    would call 8-9 months "years"
    Been longer than 8-9 months. Been well over 12, which would take it to the couple of years bracket like i said. Was like it before i moved to Townsville which was 16 mths ago.

  8. #8
    Community Member Visty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    Been longer than 8-9 months. Been well over 12, which would take it to the couple of years bracket like i said. Was like it before i moved to Townsville which was 16 mths ago.
    the ability to open on hard went live with the f2p model

    General Quest Changes

    * VIP players will be given the option to enter Hard difficulty dungeons without first completing the Normal difficulty mode.
    http://compendium.ddo.com/wiki/Relea...mited_Official

    so yes, ist 8-9 months
    Love Life of an Ooze: One ooze. Idiot hits ooze. Two oozes.
    0
    *insert axe*
    o o

  9. #9
    Community Member Boldrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    Here i was the other day on my new char, barb/ftr/rogue, lvl 5 and i saw an lfm up for a gwylans group 5-8. A couple of things struck my eye. One was "no noobs", another was "need hard/elite opener", third thing was, needed rogue or pally. As i have maxed rogue skills, i applied for the job. I got declined. When i asked why, the response was, "yeah as if you will be able to do the traps with one lvl of rogue".

    Now i refer back to the comment "no noobs". Unless the game has changed drastically, you can open quests on hard right off the bat, been that way for a couple of years. Additionally the comment about not being able to do the traps purely because of 1 lvl of rogue. My 1 lvl of rogue has the same trapsmithing abilities as a full class lvl 5 rogue.

    I reached the conclusion that the party leader shouldve excluded themselves from the group as they didnt want any noobs.

    Is this the current state of the game, that people cant think beyond the standard classes, or that they lack the social skills to ask, rather than just blanket decline.

    When i have applied for groups with my fighter/ranger/rogue i have been asked if i can do the rogue stuff, to which i usually either reply "yes" and explain my abilities, or if im being a bit sarcastic, i will ask them if they can do what their class is supposed to, this often meets with a laugh and acceptance into the group.

    Whilst i realise that a lot of classes MC with rogue or monk for evasion and dont take rogue skills, i have also come across a lot of full class rogues that dont take the basics, proclaimining to be "combat" rogues.

    To cap it off, they proceeded to take into their group a lvl 8 wiz/rogue and you guessed it, 1 lvl of rogue.
    Why would you even want in that group, just go solo it, lol.
    Boldrin//Grandmaster Flash//Cartaras
    Plucky // Whipping //Malachus
    Juxta//Pigsticker//Stealyour// Internet
    Proud member of Loreseekers

  10. #10
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boldrin View Post
    Why would you even want in that group, just go solo it, lol.
    I was being sociable lol

  11. #11
    Community Member Boldrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    I was being sociable lol
    Lies!! I call foul!!
    Boldrin//Grandmaster Flash//Cartaras
    Plucky // Whipping //Malachus
    Juxta//Pigsticker//Stealyour// Internet
    Proud member of Loreseekers

  12. #12
    Community Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    Is this the current state of the game
    Yes

  13. #13
    Community Member Rydin_Dirtay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    To cap it off, they proceeded to take into their group a lvl 8 wiz/rogue and you guessed it, 1 lvl of rogue.
    Think about it this way...you just MIGHT have educated that fool. (he ended up taking a rogue multi)
    Khyber:Greenberry, Jemric, Qashta, Leuk, Thurradal + many others

  14. #14
    Community Member Aussieee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rydin_Dirtay View Post
    Think about it this way...you just MIGHT have educated that fool. (he ended up taking a rogue multi)
    I would have take the wiz/rogue as well , if I have given the choise of the 2. Wiz usually have high int. A lot more points to spend and he was also higher level which means he has better loot(maybe), like search,dd etc.

    I am not saying that maybe he wont be able to get the traps, but if I had to pick wiz will win....
    Aussie, Minimonbon,Rockstarr-Leader of Utopia
    Trade List

  15. #15
    Community Member McKillington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I think my WF haggle Barb got declined from the same group

  16. #16
    Community Member Lo_Pan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    324

    Default

    When you reach the age of 25 we can begin to talk about the thing you call 'thinking'. Until then, the brain fairy still hasn't began to give you all of your marbles back!

  17. #17
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aussieee View Post
    I would have take the wiz/rogue as well , if I have given the choise of the 2. Wiz usually have high int. A lot more points to spend and he was also higher level which means he has better loot(maybe), like search,dd etc.

    I am not saying that maybe he wont be able to get the traps, but if I had to pick wiz will win....
    Pretty narrow minded approach there, but i expected nothing less. So what you are saying is, a lvl 6, with maxed rogue skills applies to join the group, that you would decline them, just on the off chance that a 7/1 wiz/rogue would apply, just on the off chance that they actually had rogue skills?

    Thing is, wasnt a choice of deciding between the 2, first one applied and was declined, everyone else left the group and then the wiz applied some time later, so wasnt a choice at all. A lvl 8, might, not necessarily will, but might have marginally better gear than the lvl 6 in question. Gear is incremented at odd numbers, so lvl 7 for example. My char is now lvl 7 and has RR gear that is +10, tell me again how the lvl 8 would have better gear? Short answer is, they wouldnt.

    There wasnt a choice. If there were 2 to choose from, so be it, but there wasnt end of story, so no relevance to the post in question.

  18. #18
    Community Member SirAppleheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seldarin View Post
    Pretty narrow minded approach there, but i expected nothing less. So what you are saying is, a lvl 6, with maxed rogue skills applies to join the group, that you would decline them, just on the off chance that a 7/1 wiz/rogue would apply, just on the off chance that they actually had rogue skills?

    Thing is, wasnt a choice of deciding between the 2, first one applied and was declined, everyone else left the group and then the wiz applied some time later, so wasnt a choice at all. A lvl 8, might, not necessarily will, but might have marginally better gear than the lvl 6 in question. Gear is incremented at odd numbers, so lvl 7 for example. My char is now lvl 7 and has RR gear that is +10, tell me again how the lvl 8 would have better gear? Short answer is, they wouldnt.

    There wasnt a choice. If there were 2 to choose from, so be it, but there wasnt end of story, so no relevance to the post in question.
    Now to be a bit nit-picky, but the boringly narrow-minded reply here was not Aussieee's. They said that IF given the choice of the two they'd prefer the Wiz/Rogue. That statement in itself has no real impact on your explained situation as, just as you mentioned yourself, it was most likely not a case of them having a choice. That said though, most likely at least. So how is it narrow-minded to express the view that a wizard hybrid of a higher level is more likely to have higher rogue skills then a non-wiz hybrid of lower level? That sounds more like common sense to me.

    Also while you are NOW level 7 and have RR'd gear with the same skill levels on it your original post said that you were level 5 at the time, so at that time you did NOT have those items equipped. The fact that you at a later time got better gear doesn't negate the fact that at the time of the situation you posted about in the OP you did not, which is what other comments were based on.

    No need to get cranky just because someone has a different opinion from your own, and no need to start getting defensive and making up new premises for the described situation.
    Last edited by SirAppleheart; 05-27-2010 at 09:29 AM.

  19. #19
    Community Member Rydin_Dirtay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aussieee View Post
    I would have take the wiz/rogue as well , if I have given the choise of the 2. Wiz usually have high int. A lot more points to spend and he was also higher level which means he has better loot(maybe), like search,dd etc.

    I am not saying that maybe he wont be able to get the traps, but if I had to pick wiz will win....


    You are assuming the party leader had a choice. He did not. The Wiz/Rog wasn't even on the radar yet.
    Khyber:Greenberry, Jemric, Qashta, Leuk, Thurradal + many others

  20. #20
    Hero Gawna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SirAppleheart View Post
    No need to get cranky just because someone has a different opinion from your own, and no need to start getting defensive and making up new premises for the described situation.
    You're obviously new to Seldarin's posts.
    Awnoo . Mayonnaise . Cellebrian . Gawnaball . Gawna . Gawnaderp .
    Gawnasorc . Mamadapolis . Gawnahjeal . Winnar .
    Quote Originally Posted by Eladiun View Post
    Gawno is excrement; Gawna is excellent.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload