Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default Nuker CC or Buffer debuffer?

    Would you rather have a caster that was mainly a Nuker CC caster (with haste) or a caster that is a buffer debuffer (with firewall)?

  2. #2
    Community Member Sirea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    You can have it all.
    Sohryu ~ Raven's Guard ~ Orien

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynnabel View Post
    Traps in DDO don't actually deal damage, they politely ask your avatar to damage themselves.

  3. #3
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Thats fine but that doesn't answer the question.

  4. #4
    Community Member Sirea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    OK, I'll put it this way then: I'd rather be versatile enough to be able to do any of it when needed. Having said that, I think a caster who exists only to buff and debuff is kind of limiting themselves.
    Sohryu ~ Raven's Guard ~ Orien

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynnabel View Post
    Traps in DDO don't actually deal damage, they politely ask your avatar to damage themselves.

  5. #5
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    699

    Default

    My two cents:

    You'd be hard pressed to build a sorc or wiz that couldn't be good enough at both to make the choice moot. [It would be a greater trade-off if they had more good spells in the DPS/buff-debuff arena.]

    If comparing strict specced casters, tho, an arcane buffer/debuffer will be less useful than a CC/DPSer. Why? Because debuffing enemies is generally inefficient SP use, so they would be relatively idle in combat unless buffing. That's why bards and clerics make excellent buffers/debuffers -- because in addition to those buffs and debuffs spells, they HEAL.

    But any CC/DPS can carry useful spells -- Jump, Resist, Haste, Displacement, Stoneskin -- or use wands/scrolls to get the same effect. However, you can't wand offensive spells worth a dang.
    Last edited by gavagai; 01-30-2010 at 04:36 PM.

  6. #6
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gavagai View Post
    My two cents:

    You'd be hard pressed to build a sorc or wiz that couldn't be good enough at both to make the choice moot. [It would be a greater trade-off if they had more good spells in the DPS/buff-debuff arena.]

    If comparing strict specced casters, tho, an arcane buffer/debuffer will be less useful than a CC/DPSer. Why? Because debuffing enemies is generally inefficient SP use, so they would be relatively idle in combat unless buffing. That's why bards and clerics make excellent buffers/debuffers -- because in addition to those buffs and debuffs spells, they HEAL.

    But any CC/DPS can carry useful spells -- Jump, Resist, Haste, Displacement, Stoneskin -- or use wands/scrolls to get the same effect. However, you can't wand offensive spells worth a dang.
    Thank you! Thats very helpful and has probably saved me allot of grief.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload