A Wall of Text For Better Descriptions

[sirgog]

/signed to all of it (including the 'controversial' part re. flavor text).

Flavor text, IMO, should be in italics.

[TechNoFear]

Not having numerical amounts is my pet annoyance.
How do I know if taking the WF THF enhancement line upgrading glancing hit effect chance is worth it even after in-game testing?
(When we are dealing with low numbers (+ ~1%) only triggering on rare events (<10%) that only occur on, at max, 75% of attacks.)

I understand that this allows the devs latitiude to tweak these effects based on live data. However, as Borror0 points out, these descriptions do not get updated.

I do understand the issues in updating the descriptions in the live DB. I have had a misplaced/unexpected apostrophe wreak havoc on more than one occassion.

I am interested to see how long it will be before the descriptions for short duration spell damage buffs (Inferno etc) take to catch up to the new percentages.

U3 increases them from 10% to 15% / lvl but the description on Lama has not been updated (so unless you have read the release notes carefully there is no way of knowing you can get an extra 25% damage).

[Asketes]

bravo

[FauxSho]

bravo

Yeah, sure. Blame the guy who was cold and asked to turn up the heat by setting the thermostat to a slightly higher setting. It's surely his fault that some other people didn't actually listen but decided to burn down the house instead.

[Josh]

A great thread that has been completely ignored by the developers.

[Burtle]