Negative Reputation.

[Twerpp]

To be honest, 100 rep only goes so far. I can hit, from what I heard, for -35 rep. Takes three or four people like me who don't like one of your post and you're back in the red.

lmao. Time for the neg rep MAX DPS competition.

[toughguyjoe]

I got about -60ish rep for a post that read:

Bandyman1 > Kerns

I found that hilarious, as i was merely stating my preference to an ingame player i know rather than one that i know from the forums only.

Made me chuckle

[Visty]

considering that ppl negrep you because you answered a question shows that the system is flawed

but also its fun if you proove someone wrong and he negreps you cause he know he lost

[Corebreach]

-Must acquire 1500 rep to leave neg rep.

How many boxes is that? Five dim + five bright? The dim ones seem to be 100, and the bright ones are 200 on another forum I know of that uses this reputation scheme.

[Borror0]

How many boxes is that? Five dim + five bright? The dim ones seem to be 100, and the bright ones are 200 on another forum I know of that uses this reputation scheme.

Correct. The best way to tell is to hover the boxes and it will tell you the person's rank. If the person is "Commended", "Renowned", "Honored" or "Hero of the People", then he or she is able to give neg rep. Ranks under that (Neutral, Noted, Reliable and Trustworthy) can't.

[Junts]

the 6th bright square appears at 1500 .. question, by the way .. about to hit 2000 and I haven't gained another block .. does it end at 5/6?

[Borror0]

the 6th bright square appears at 1500 .. question, by the way .. about to hit 2000 and I haven't gained another block .. does it end at 5/6?

Memnir is over 5000 and he still has 5/6 so it probably stop at 5/6.

[Memnir]

I think I've also maxed out the Rep Titles, too... I'm way over 5,000 now and the title has stayed the same.
I'm not complaining, just bizarre.

[Aspenor]

I think I've also maxed out the Rep Titles, too... I'm way over 5,000 now.

It makes sense that Hero of the People would be the highest title.

**** Mem, I guess all those funny pics got you tons of rep, eh?

[Memnir]

A lot of it is from the funny stuff, yes. But a good percentage is also from when I try to make a point, too. Or rather, make a point w/o the pics or attempts at humor.

[Impaqt]

My Rep isnt where its at due to my Charming Personality.

[Aspenor]

My rep is pretty spread out from everything from solid advice and funny posts to making fun of Shade, Tinyelvis and Borror0. Ironically, I think usually when I get rep for making fun of Borr, it's Borr giving me the rep.

[Borror0]

I'm way over 5,000 now and the title has stayed the same.

I figured that was the case. I'm curious by how much rep you're above 5,000 though.

[Memnir]

PM sent, Borr.

[Lorien_the_First_One]

I have neg rep linked to these 2 posts according to UserCP.

http://forums.ddo.com/showpost.php?p...9&postcount=76
http://forums.ddo.com/showpost.php?p...1&postcount=47

Well the first one I don't know why they would have neg repped except possibly for your exageration about lag causing 20 swings to 1 to miss. Silly exageration does annoy some people.

The second one, trying to conform to PnP 1 swing per sec is a bad idea, you defense of your bad idea with "too many" as you answer to what you thought the current system was showed a lack of knowledge of the system and a lack of insightful contribution. Such a snippy and non contributing answer can draw neg rep.

[Lorien_the_First_One]

Unless your name is Memnir, you don't get a zillion positive rep for being funny. Being funny pays more than normal posts, but it won't magically earn you 500 rep.

Meh. Man up!!

I've gotten pos rep for looking funny, does that count?

[Borror0]

I've gotten pos rep for looking funny, does that count?

Well, at least you didn't get rep for smelling funny... right?

[Aspenor]

Well, at least you didn't get rep for smelling funny... right?

He doesn't smell funny, he smells FUNKY.

[whysper]

There is an alternate.

[redoubt]

I think that all feedback should show who it was from. Being able to post a comment would also be nice.

Its not usually an issue leaving a positive comment and putting your name on it. On the flip side, I think many people would not want to leave a negative comment if they had to put their name on it. For that very reason, I think the persons name should go on it.

If you are unwilling to put your name on it, is your approval or disapproval really valid? I applaud all those you are willing to say it in the thread that they are giving rep. Even more so to those who explain why.

Anyone who gives negative rep with good reason would have nothing to fear even if it was reported to the moderators. Also, the system already requires you to spread rep around, so massive retaliation would not be possible. (Assuming the "spread" applies negative rep as it does positive.) Finally, someone who threw neg rep as retaliation could be reported. The moderators could easily judge the situation when the data is easily found and presented.