Please limit mulitclassing to only 2 classes

[Thrudh]

I would think after enough neg rep, one's posting privileges would be taken away...

[Aspenor]

I would think after enough neg rep, one's posting privileges would be taken away...

I say we see how much it takes.

[iamsamoth0]

Since '79 and the red basic book, it was race was a class, then the AD&D rules opened it up to 3 multi, am I right?

[moorewr]

I've itched to give neg rep so many times.. just 320 more points of rep..

[rjedi]

I say we see how much it takes.

lol O.o but what if he gets enouhg positive rep to start neg repping us for pos repping him??

[Aspenor]

lol O.o but what if he gets enouhg positive rep to start neg repping us for pos repping him??

impossible, judging by his current bar he has about -100 rep, maybe even more in the negative.

[Kistilan]

This is the first time I've -1 Zing'd someone.

Bad idea. And not true to D&D at all. Double bad idea.

[cdbd3rd]

I say we see how much it takes.

Now there's an idea I can get behind.

Have a /nudge.

I've itched to give neg rep so many times.. just 320 more points of rep..

<.<


>.>


/Pokes.

[Kistilan]

Since '79 and the red basic book, it was race was a class, then the AD&D rules opened it up to 3 multi, am I right?

1st and 2nd Edition did offer the awesome ability of fighter/mage/thief and fighter/mage in the elven heritage among other deadly combinations.

In other words, yes.

3.0/3.5 offers multi-classing options where some characters may even have 4-5 classes pending on the build. My favorites are typically fighter-rogue or fighter-cleric hybrids mixed in with 2 prestige classes.

[Eelpout]

Mulitclassing leads to all kinds of party confusion, and it is difficult to form a party when there are too many classes attached to one character.

Looks like it is time to bring out my ultra-rare, special occasion reply...


Who's my silly boy? You are, your my silly boy...Tickle...Tickle...

[Dexxaan]

Mulitclassing leads to all kinds of party confusion, and it is difficult to form a party when there are too many classes attached to one character.

Too funny.

How about "Please limit ******s from posting requests that confirm their limitations of criteria".

...snip.....

God speed (you away from me)

LOL

[Letrii]

/bingo
is the bare minimum of acceptable

I understand why they did limit it to three but I'd perfera high number

Aesop

Why is it they limit number of classes you can be?

[Memnir]

.
.

.
.
.

[Lorien_the_First_One]

I would think after enough neg rep, one's posting privileges would be taken away...

I say we see how much it takes.

Well after the other guy hit 3 red boxes I didn't see him post anymore.

Apparently what happens is if the rep goes neg enough every post hits the moderators eyes for review and at some point every post is suspended until the mod approves it, effectively banning them from posting unless they have a real attitude shift.

[Kalari]

.
.

.
.
.

lol take it to Mem to bring the only true highlight of this bad thread still wish I could just continuously rep you it would make my life far easier then figuring out when I can hit the +1 again

[KillEveryone]

Since '79 and the red basic book, it was race was a class, then the AD&D rules opened it up to 3 multi, am I right?

1st and 2nd Edition did offer the awesome ability of fighter/mage/thief and fighter/mage in the elven heritage among other deadly combinations.

In other words, yes.

3.0/3.5 offers multi-classing options where some characters may even have 4-5 classes pending on the build. My favorites are typically fighter-rogue or fighter-cleric hybrids mixed in with 2 prestige classes.

AD&D also allowed dual classing for humans. I don't rember dual classing being in the boxed set. I think the boxed set also required demi-humans to have some sort of multi-class skills....but I don't rember off the top of my head and all my stuff is packed until I move later this week. We also tended to use a house rule set with stuff comming from older material and AD&D rule set.

I really liked dual classing my humans. I always did. Some don't and most of the DMs that I have talked to about this didn't care for it or let their human players use it. If you built right you could have a really powerful character. I always had good DMs that factored that sort of stuff in.

Well after the other guy hit 3 red boxes I didn't see him post anymore.

Apparently what happens is if the rep goes neg enough every post hits the moderators eyes for review and at some point every post is suspended until the mod approves it, effectively banning them from posting unless they have a real attitude shift.

I think he left. I thought I saw a post of his stating that he was leaving.

Regarding neg rep...Do people give it out just because they don't like the idea or is it just because someone deserves it because they are being ****ish.

Unless the moderators had gotten to his origional post in this thread I don't think his post was trollish...just a bad idea.

[hydra_ex]

.
.

.
.
.

I hate you Mem! I just can't give you enough rep!

[moorewr]

Regarding neg rep...Do people give it out just because they don't like the idea or is it just because someone deserves it because they are being ****ish.

To me the only valid reason to neg rep is a breach of civility. Merely having a bad idea shouldn't do it. However, rudeness and ad hominem are so often a bad idea's handmaidens...

[Creeper]

Mulitclassing leads to all kinds of party confusion, and it is difficult to form a party when there are too many classes attached to one character.

You want only two classes allowed -- I want four; so, let's compromise and limit it to only three classes!

[Talon_Moonshadow]

That's cause your obsessed with roles.

There is no spoon.