Light/Good vs Positive Spells

[nbhs275]

No, you're saying that a FvS that chooses not to heal is playing wrong. And I am saying that you have no right to tell others how to play.

Nice backpedaling on the whole 'putting words in my mouth' thing, too. No apology?

Well, yea i would say that if your playing a class where one of thier most powerful and useful functions is healing, and you don't heal, your pretty ****ing dumb. If that is the goal, to not heal, play something else. Not making use of the class abilities of any class is a a poor choice.

I guess what im trying to tell you, is that playing a FvS who can't heal, is alot like a rogue who doesnt make use of evasion, or a caster who doesnt cast spells. It's weak.

[Weylan]

Well, yea i would say that if your playing a class where one of thier most powerful and useful functions is healing, and you don't heal, your pretty ****ing dumb.

Resorting to insults, I see.

If that is the goal, to not heal, play something else. Not making use of the class abilities of any class is a a poor choice.

Rangers get all sorts of ranged combat feats for free, and hardly anyone will play them as archers. Are you saying all ranger players have made a poor choice?

See? That argument is pretty dumb, isn't it? Kind of like the one you put forward.

I guess what im trying to tell you, is that playing a FvS who can't heal, is alot like a rogue who doesnt make use of evasion, or a caster who doesnt cast spells. It's weak.

You can't play a Rogue without Evasion unless you have less than 2 Rogue levels. In which case you are more than likely only level 1, or mostly another class.

You don't have to approve of people playing however they want to. You only have to accept it.

[nbhs275]

Resorting to insults, I see.

Informing someone that if they simply believe something that is in complete opposition to fact, isnt an insult. If a man tells you that the sky is purple and made of peanutbutter....would it be an insult to regard him as wrong?

Rangers get all sorts of ranged combat feats for free, and hardly anyone will play them as archers. Are you saying all ranger players have made a poor choice?

Well, considering that a pure archer would be someone neglecting the stronger aspect of a class for the weaker, no. The best rangers out there all make use of ranged combat when it makes sense.

See? That argument is pretty dumb, isn't it? Kind of like the one you put forward.

Yes, i'll agree, your arguement was pretty dumb. Hmm...dumb, isnt that the word that is so insulting to you? Hmm, let me try a different way to discribe you that your probably use too. Your arguement is very "special"

You can't play a Rogue without Evasion unless you have less than 2 Rogue levels. In which case you are more than likely only level 1, or mostly another class.

Or you can be a rogue in more then light armor. Or who doesnt load enough strength to not be encumbered. Both of which are "special" ideas some of our forums du,....."special" posters have suggested.

You don't have to approve of people playing however they want to. You only have to accept it.

And again, your right i can't control how people play. But i know that i and everyone else with a pulse and IQ over 60 doesn't love running with gimpy idiots. So sure, you CAN do stupid, unexplainable ****. But don't complain when no one will touch you with a ten foot stick.

OOOOH...and again, this a forum about the CLASS, not the player. And if your going to maximize the power of the class, it becomes a black and white situation, of A_D and me being right, and you being clueless.

[Weylan]

OOOOH...and again, this a forum about the CLASS, not the player. And if your going to maximize the power of the class, it becomes a black and white situation, of A_D and me being right, and you being clueless.

I guess I'll just go back to my 'fun' and let you and A_D continue on with 'maximizing the power of the class' then.

Don't forget the KY.