more high AC mobs plz

[Garth_of_Sarlona]

it's all down to the d20 system - the gap between 'really really bad' and 'really really good' is only 20 wide - so if the devs add mobs with AC in the 60s then mobs with ACs in the 40s become 'hit on a 1' again. The same problem affects player AC and (as someone has already said) spell pen numbers.

I posted a while back about the 'd40' system or a 'd100' system - but DDO is pretty much tied to the d20 system so -meh- what can we do?

Garth

[Talon_Moonshadow]

I think the key words here are "a set of mobs". This is not something all mobs need, but it would be nice if some mobs were like this. The problem with tempest spine back in the day, was that it was the only raid, and the quest is full of blackguards. Moderation is key.

The monks in monastary begin to come close to this, they have a higher than normal AC, though you probably won't notice it unless your gear isn't so great. Well that and you'd have to actually spend the time to fight them.

I agree with this.
Most of my chars are not full BAB chars. And it would hurt PA, and Manyshot....etc. (Edit: + TWF, +1 W/P Rapiers......things like that. But also Rogues And anyone not speced for a high to hit number. So Use in moderation is best IMO.)

But I'm for variety.
Having some mobs needing different tactics is a good thing IMO.

[GlassCannon]

I'd like to see monsters with 75% fortification seeded throughout quests.

[SableShadow]

I'd like to see monsters with 75% fortification seeded throughout quests.

I thought they were called "undead" and "constructs"?

[Thrudh]

This is pretty much the situation we have right now with spell resist in the vale quests. Either your caster has a Spell pen item, both feats, and all 3 enhancmenets, or you are wasting your spellpoints casting anything but buffs or direct damage.

This is a good point...

[Emili]

There was a problem when TSE had the crazy ACs. Anyone else remember the following LFMs:

"TSE, melee must have +10 to hit Action boost" which meant 1 rogue for traps, no barbs or rangers.

Now granted in todays game crazy AC's are not solved in this way. Instead melees surround the mob to immobilize it and swing innefectively until the caster's firewall kills it (Old time-y vampire on elite at lvl 10ish for one).

The biggest problem is the difference between a 54 strength raged barbarian's to hit, and the 30 str paladin's to hit. If the maxed out barb cant hit on a 2, then the non-optimal/not yet raid-loot-loaded builds are hoping for a 20 just to hit, forget critting.

This is pretty much the situation we have right now with spell resist in the vale quests. Either your caster has a Spell pen item, both feats, and all 3 enhancmenets, or you are wasting your spellpoints casting anything but buffs or direct damage.

That is exactly how I remember it... The common tactic back then was to

1.) take an intimitank... turtled up, hit intimidate ... occasionally swinging a maladoit.
2.) Then all the fighters sporting +10 to-hit Attack boost would lay in on them, Pallys were fine as long as they used the then broken divine favor and were a str build, Barbarians were along for the ride as rage was not very high back then.

note... 3/4 BaB bards/rogues/clerics and such could only hit them on a 20 even under all buffs until the dex was drained enough , by which time most were killed by the fighters. Plus casters back then had it rough also as it predated FW and many persistant aoe spells.

Fighter was knocked down in not only to-hit boost, but class enhancements to AC (Fighter CE) etc... mainly so that other classes could get in on participating in melee.

One problem with that - and your post is related to it - is that fighter as a class lost it's general function... since it is totally and easily replaceable with any other class.

At this point, in the game fighter top to-hit is comparable to ranger (FE), Barbarian (raged less quad) and Pally (DM + DF)... So then, even if you increased mob AC the fighter kensai to-hit bonus would now become a must have for a fighter to be even on par with those other full BaB classes... yet those other full BaB classes maintain on average a better AC, Saves and defensive mitigation for survivability. Only the 3/4 BaB become more docile in such an encounter... while it's probably better to grab a Pally, Barb or Ranger for them before the kensai.

[Raithe]

This is a good point...

I didn't really think so. The Vale and its quests are excellent examples of diversity as far as spell resistance goes. Some things have none, the scorpions and bats are fairly low SR, while the high SR mobs can still make a maxxed-out caster fail on a 1. The problem here isn't the diversity of the mobs, its the enhancements that basically make their defenses moot. SR is supposed to make a caster waste his spell points to at least some degree, and is supposed to encourage letting melee do their thing.

It hasn't really worked, because of the playerbase and its mentality. They all immediately dump the feats/enhancements they had and all go get spell pen because it makes the current quests easier, even though its entirely useless in some of the game. I think it demonstrates some of the problems developers of this kind of game face. When everything and everyone is min/maxxed (except for a few losers like myself), it's difficult to walk down the center line.

They could definitely raise the bar on AC a bit, IMO, though. At least on some things.

[EinarMal]

its ~200 a minute for both hands (100 each), so a TWF would do an average of 400 to self a minute, not 800

800 is the double frenzy number... It is 1d3 x 200 per minute hasted or 400 for a single frenzy, or 800 for double frenzy.

[Lithic]

I'd like to see monsters with 75% fortification seeded throughout quests.

Fortification is the worst possible thing in game. There is NO counter, and it makes one class (rogues) almost completely useless. 25% of the raid devils is bad enough, constructs/slimes/undead are much worse, but to regularly have quests with fortified mobs is BAD, at least until rogues get enhancements or feats to bypass significant fortifications (something along the lines of -25%/50/75 for a cost of 1/2/3).