My OPINION

[Borror0]

It's extremely relevant.

Of course the definition of science you use is relevant, but it is also wrong.

By your own definition, science possesses the truth and is never wrong.

[branmakmuffin]

Of course the definition of science you use is relevant, but it is also wrong.

It doesn't matter. You knew the parameters of what I meant when I used the word "science." Now, since you're unable to substantively make ground in the argument, you're deciding to have a fit about a word I used in an unorthodox way, but which I said, several times, I was using in that unorthodox way. If it will make you feel better, you can continue to fulminate over my non-standard use of the word "science," all the while being in full knowledge of what I meant, since I told you several times.

But your definition is wrong. And I'm not going to sit here having a conversation about a cat when it's obviously a dog.

You already did. And now that you, like Borror0, are unable to make further headway substantively, you decide now is a good time to have a cow about my use of the word "science." How about we just say, in my context, "science" is shorthand for "the physical laws of our universe, regardless of what we actually know about them," since that's what I meant, and that is what I made clear I meant.

[bobbryan2]

It doesn't matter. You knew the parameters of what I meant when I used the word "science." Now, since you're unable to substantively make ground in the argument, you're deciding to have a fit about a word I used in an unorthodox way, but which I said, several times, I was using in that unorthodox way. If it will make you feel better, you can continue to fulminate over my non-standard use of the word "science," all the while being in full knowledge of what I meant, since I told you several times.

Bran.. what conversation can there be when someone is using a word for truth.

How can you argue about truth?

What is there even left to say about truth?

Truth is... true... man. Whoa... that's deep.