Honestly, don't argue respec with Kistilan. You will never win.
You can tell him whatever reason you want, his argument is "This is not what D&D is about" You can tell him about how a MMO environment is better, he doesn't care. You can explain to him that if a DM plays with the rules, it is only fair that he lets players adjust to the new rules. He doesn't care. You can show him that D&D allows it, he doesn't care. You can explain how changes made to the game negatively affect the enjoyment from the game, and how respecs prevents a lot of that frustration. He doesn't care.
Because, in his mind, this is not D&D.
His position isn't rational, it's based on emotions. It's not based on facts, it's based on a biased perception of reality.
While I have respec for the man, debating respec with him has only proved to be a waste of time. He has no valid argument, but still keeps arguing.
Last edited by Borror0; 12-10-2008 at 03:34 AM.
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.
I just want to point out that reconstruction for a magic item is the same as respec for a character, just on a smaller scale. Both of those topics had threads created today because Barb Critical Rage was nerfed, which reduces the value of both axes and barb levels.
In both cases you are altering a choice applied to an in-game element that would otherwise be permanent. And in both cases, the strongest justification for allowing the alteration to be made is if the underlying game-rules have been changed so that the reasons for making the original choice no longer exist.
Of course, there are other reasons as well:
* To correct for user-interface errors (which might have been the fault of the player, or the programmer)
* To be forgiving to users who have increased their knowledge of game rules after starting playing
* To compensate for the fact that the developers have occasionally published incomplete or incorrect game rules
* To make the game more fun for people who are unsatisfied with their current choice for whatever reason
Incorrect.
You will always win. In fact, even if you don't argue it you'll still win.
It even seems possible that Kistilian is in favor of respecs, and is intentionally posting weak objections just to give people the chance to refute them and make the changes seem like an even better idea.
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.
Mhykke(Pldn):Mhykkelle(Srcr):Mykkelle(Rngr):Mhykael(Clrc):Mykke(Brbrn):Mhykel(Ftr):Mhykelle(Wzrd):Mhyke(Brd):Mykkael(Rgr/Rog/Barb):Mykkel(Rog):Mhykkaelsan(Mnk):Mhykkael(FVS):Mhykkel(Brd):Markas(Ret.Srcr)
It's absolutely imperative that deconstruction be put in the game, now.
Conan and Warhammer...
Then again, back when Module 7 added Green Steel Axes (in a brilliant move to make the mod6 raid overshadow the newer content), he'd already made at least 4 tier-3 greensteel hammers for his dwarf characters. It's plausible that having the effort invested in those items negated was part of the reason he quit this game.
Last edited by Angelus_dead; 12-10-2008 at 07:39 AM.
*cries*
I have a greensteel Great Crossbow
For the love of god Turbine!
Please!
Silly Rabbit, ADD is not just for kids
Kobolds are the goats of DDO!
Mhykke(Pldn):Mhykkelle(Srcr):Mykkelle(Rngr):Mhykael(Clrc):Mykke(Brbrn):Mhykel(Ftr):Mhykelle(Wzrd):Mhyke(Brd):Mykkael(Rgr/Rog/Barb):Mykkel(Rog):Mhykkaelsan(Mnk):Mhykkael(FVS):Mhykkel(Brd):Markas(Ret.Srcr)
omg yes please
/signed
/seconded
/agreed
READ ME NEW PLAYERS!!!
Aeneas - Boosterseat - Eulogy - Diminutive - Moths
/signed
yeah, loss of Power shards, and energy cells, NOT larges!
Do It!
Heck, just put Fred's Cousin in Meridia, and do a 10K plat, and 3 day timer, why not? Acceptable?
DO AWAY WITH DUNGEON ALERT< BRING BACK INDIVIDUAL DEATH PENALTIES!
It makes better players of all of us.
Darpa: Xoriat
http://kevinpape.com
Well, I don't disagree with your points Davey. I honestly don't disagree with what you're saying at all. 'cept I don't have any items crafted yet because I saw where this was going (and why I halted level progression prior to 15 on my characters).
Now, I don't expect everyone to have seen all of this coming their way. However, I don't think respec is the answer and deconstruction in a pure format either.
I think there should be a risk. A 1 for 1 tradeoff to say "I take it back!" is a little eggregious. It's a tad unfair to anyone. I don't care if you wasted a ton of ingredients on mistakes. I'm glad people did that, thanks for the recipes, thanks for the research.
I just want to throw out a different answer to this idea of "greensteel deconstruction." There should be a risk in the refinement process of tearing a melded item apart. I would say if deconstruction was free it be up to 100% chance of loss of all ingredients, whereas if it requires a payment or special (not too) rare item that it generate a 50, 25 or 0 percent chance of loss of items. IE, you could lose randomly 25% 50% or 0% of the items required in making said greensteel when it is deconstructed into raw components.
This is a based on reality and also life for the game. Again, I'll post my arguement later concerning this. I am still against a 100% free 100% risk-free respec. Turbine obviously intended people to have to "trial and error" the greensteel crafting from the beginning. Their sacrifices were expected to uncover recipes. You cannot deny that. I cannot bleed a heart or shed a tear for them, but I do thank them for their work.
Seems like it would be in keeping with the spirit of PnP crafting.. with some random losses from the contents, perhaps..
I'd dearly like the ingredients back out of my lightning II longsword.. I know that much...
<|| “Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch’entrate.” ||>
AEsahaettr | AlfredSartan | Botharel | PeterMurphy | Weesham etc.
I think that I might take your opinion more seriously if you actually participated in the endgame content. It's all well and good to have a passionate opinion on character/item respecs but I would suggest that you might be a bit more informed if you were involved in the process itself.
-Thelanis-
Eidur / Ellsi / Essien