is turbine just plain stupid or what

[akpavker]

so some bunch of idiots went through the shroud and cheated with deathpact in part 4 so why didnt u morons just get rid of deathpact insted of punished every 1 by closing down shroud turbine your a bunch of fool im sick of the silly **** yas do like this screew yas im of to warhammer and i hope yas lose half your customers goodbye

[HeavenlyCloud]

Nice offensive post against turbine on their own forums

[Mhykke]

Nice offensive post against turbine on their own forums

Nice defensive post for turbine on their own forums.

[ArkoHighStar]

well enjoy warhammer, I'm not even going to bother explaining why they didn't shut off deathpact

[akpavker]

gone

[Hobgoblin]

turbine is run by a woman

nice sexist post jackass

why the hell should it matter if ddo is run a man woman or an alien tranvisit? If i should happen to go to warhammer as well please tell the name of your toons there so i can avoid those pos as well

[akpavker]

nice sexist post jackass

why the hell should it matter if ddo is run a man woman or an alien tranvisit? If i should happen to go to warhammer as well please tell the name of your toons there so i can avoid those pos as well

but im hopin mad

[Mhykke]

but im hopin mad

Hopin for what?

[Osharan_Tregarth]

Hmm... Well.. Here's the deal.

Shutting down a quest.. Any quest.. Is something that turbine can do, without any actual involvment in changing the game code. They have the technology available, without needing to change the game's code, get it tested, and pushed thru any type of qa process.

I'd imagine, based on previous posts, that the "turn off death pact" idea involves changing game coding, and is not something that they can do from their servers.

I don't have any idea of the exact timeframes involved, but I'd say there's a good chance that this process wouldn't have gotten the shroud up too many days earlier than their current plan is going to.


I don't blame turbine for this one.. I blame our fellow gamers, who decided to mess up their fellow party members gaming experiences, and now this is the result.

Same type of people who were determined to summon pets when the pit fiend was buggable, even tho the rest of the party said they didn't want to...

That's who the fingers need to get pointed at in this case.

I don't really care who exploits what quest, or what the definition of exploiting is... Just make sure everyone involved is on the same page.

[Kistilan]

gone

<=== It's like predicting your own future.

Nice Inoffensive Nondefensive post on Turbine's forums.

And now, for the thenthitive folks.

[Oblongmana]

so some bunch of idiots went through the shroud and cheated with deathpact in part 4 so why didnt u morons just get rid of deathpact insted of punished every 1 by closing down shroud turbine your a bunch of fool im sick of the silly **** yas do like this screew yas im of to warhammer and i hope yas lose half your customers goodbye

Punctuation and correct grammar ftw

EDIT: And now I see sexism too. Stay classy

[Milolyen]

so some bunch of idiots went through the shroud and cheated with deathpact in part 4 so why didnt u morons just get rid of deathpact insted of punished every 1 by closing down shroud turbine your a bunch of fool im sick of the silly **** yas do like this screew yas im of to warhammer and i hope yas lose half your customers goodbye

Well considering the removal of the spell would require a patch ... and the patch would require testing (remember the lag caused by a meer server restart anyone???). Also remembering how many people out there actually REQUEST turbine to NOT rush fixes so that they do not cause more problems than it fixes. SO that is exactly what they are doing and because people can not resist exploiting they decided to turn off the quest because just handing out bans was not working. Seriously people ... remember more than just the last 5 mins and look into the future more than just the next 5 mins.

Milolyen

[jstroud]

....

[Festivult_Jester]

/coal. Well this is running down a bad road keep it in the guidelines folks.