Just cause im bored at work....
I dont have either w/p ss or w/p rapier.. does that make me objective? Currently I use a holy puncturing rapier and an axiomatic punturing rapier when I'm going for stat damage with my ranger. In casual questing where we are just running and gunning i'll try and keep up on kills with the w/p guys. Even when it seems we are both trying ill occasionally beat out the ss guy.. though its tough. The duel weilding rapier player? never...not unless he is really slacking off or doesnt care about kills.
On a raging barbarian, rapiers are scary fast at taking out the trash. If a barb closes with a mob and is using w/p rapiers, i wont even bother heading over to help... it will be dead long before i get there.
Also, its not just w/p. Look at the prices of any rapier compared with a similar shortsword. The rapier is always much higher priced. When im selling stuff on the AH i can barely give shortswords away, but even the low end rapiers i post always sell at a decent price.
people pay for it because that 17.5% matters
<Sarlona>Leafy - ranger , Ingvild - fighter, Backk - rogue, Dahgnabbit - warlock , Reinheits - cleric, <Lost Legion>
Yes, this sort of attitude is deserving of being ignored. If you refuse to try to grasp what I am saying, what good would 'proving' it to you do? The math proves it, because it's what governs the game's reality. Typing nonsense in caps probably changes that, though. Job well done!
Sure but the difference between just puncturing is +50% in favor of the rapier. If you're just puncturing, I won't argue that the rapier is far ahead. If you're w/p, the wounding part is 50% of the total con damage output and it's identical for both. If you run into something where you can't pass DR, then sure the rapier is better, but it's just comparing puncturing and not w/p. You can switch to a puncturing rapier if you like for those situations, but you don't need to spend 70 larges for a w/p rapier for situations where wounding won't land anyway. That makes no sense.
As far as beating a w/p shortsword with a puncturing rapier - as I posted earlier the wounding effect does 0.95 con damage per swing on average, and the puncturing does 1.05 rapier and 0.7 short sword. Again, don't compare builds - compare the weapons. Anecdotal evidence aside, the math says the w/p short sword does more than 50% additional con damage compared to the puncturing rapier. That is a bigger advantage than the puncturing rapier has over the puncturing short sword. It doesn't work both ways.
Last edited by Hadrian; 09-09-2008 at 09:51 PM.
im in the the rapier is much better than the ss boat, ive used ss before and i currently have 3 rapiers, but hadrian is anythign but a marginal player. id vouch for him any day of the week. so you may be able to dispute his arguement all day long if you want to, but there is no disputing his level of skill.
I would never argue that a straight puncturing rapier is as good as a w/p ss (the math on it is quite obvious), im not sure how you got that out of what I wrote. I was trying to communicate that it's alot easier to keep up with someone weilding ss's then with someone weilding w/p rapers, to help illustrate why the playing populace would hold said weapons in such high esteem.
<Sarlona>Leafy - ranger , Ingvild - fighter, Backk - rogue, Dahgnabbit - warlock , Reinheits - cleric, <Lost Legion>
Rapiers are better... no one is disputing that... They deal out, on average, 17.5% more CON damage than Shortswords/daggers... That IS noticeable... That is NOT game-changing.... I'm not sure how I destroyed my argument showing that on TWO ROLLS OUT OF TWENTY, the rapier is better...i think you just destroyed your argument and proved the rest of ours with this little statementOriginally Posted by Thrudh
Three rolls of 1-12 BOTH - not dead
Three rolls of 13-14 Rapiers - dead, SS - not dead
Three rolls of 15-20 BOTH - dead
thanks for that
Anyone with shortswords/daggers w/p kicks ass... Anyone with rapiers w/p kicks ass slightly more...
Rapiers ARE the best stat damagers...
All I'm saying is, if your characters aren't all maxed out, you'll get a LOT more bang for your buck getting a dozen or so top-line items to spread among all your characters than you would getting a single w/p rapier on ONE of your characters...
w/p Rapiers are only worth 100 million gold to those who have nothing else to spend their money on... At which point, money has lost all it's value to them.... The only reason w/p rapiers go for 100 million gold is not because they are equal in worth to 100 million in gold of w/p shortswords, bloodstones, firestorm greaves, spectral gloves, etc. but because the people who buy them already HAVE bloodstones, firestorm greaves, spectral gloves, etc.
I mean look at this way... Which is WORTH more to a player with zero gear...
One w/p rapier
or
Two w/p shortswords
a bloodstone
firestorm greaves
spectral gloves
Planar Gird
Boots of the Innocent
12 large ingrediants
You guys are arguing that the one w/p rapier is "worth" the same as all that... A character with the second list will be a LOT more powerful and useful in combat than the guy with just the rapier
In one sense, something is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.... That's a legitimate definition... But when you're so rich that money has no meaning... it's hard to really define "worth"
Just remember that people pay over $100 million dollars for certain paintings... That only happens when people are so rich (Billionaires) that money has lost all meaning... Is that piece of art really "worth" the same as $100 million dollars of medicine or food or housing?
Last edited by Thrudh; 09-11-2008 at 07:46 AM.