Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50
  1. #21
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticTheurge View Post
    Ouch.

    You've seen the new unarmed animations, right?
    Sure and they only took 1.5 years longer than they originally estimated.....

  2. #22
    Founder & Hero cdbd3rd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gauery View Post
    ... Anywho I could have sworn that sickles, scythes, the like were monk weapons in 3.5 ?
    Dunno about 3.5, but in 1st they had POLEARMS!!!!


    /pokes Devs.
    CEO - Cupcake's Muskateers, Thelanis
    Collectibles

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticTheurge View Post
    Ouch.

    You've seen the new unarmed animations, right?
    Yup... I think they added Bruce Lee flicks to the Animation budget..

    Heddar Dwarf Fighter L 17, Celidaer Elf Wizard L 17, Merinid Drow Bard L 16,
    Talimore Human Ranger L 5, Kuven Human Cleric L 3, Kopesh Warforged Barbarian L 4

  4. #24
    Community Member Battery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alavatar View Post
    In my opinion this all would have been solved if the Monk had originally been referred to as a Pugilist, thereby not putting either a religious, geographic, or philosophical conotation to the class. This would make the classed name general similar to the generic Fighter, Rogue, Ranger, Wizard, Druid, Cleric, Paladin, Bard, Sorcerer, and Barbarian classes. Then, as a generic class, the Pugilist weapons could be defined by a specific Type, such as light simple weapons or something.

    I blame TSR since they had monks in AD&D 1st Edition (I think).
    If it was a pugilist you would further pigeonhole them into only having boxing gloves as class weapons
    "Those who believe in telekinetics raise my hand"-Kurt Vonnegut

  5. #25
    Community Member Kaldais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Auran82 View Post
    Except Sai are blunt, not piercing.
    Sai is actually an underwater weapon, primarly used to pierce small boats or people. Chinese term for it is loosely translated to Water Parting Needles.

    Katana is actually a Tang dynasty invention, a slightly more straight blade tho, but it had more usage in Japanese culture. In reality, it should be classified as a saber not a sword. Both the Chinese and Japanese actually uses the word saber to describe a katana instead of using the word Sword.
    Last edited by Kaldais; 05-30-2008 at 10:06 AM.

  6. #26
    Community Member SniptheShadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default Kukri definition:

    Wiki:

    "The kukri (Devanāgarī: खुकुरी) is a heavy, curved Nepalese knife used as both tool and weapon. It is also a part of the regimental weaponry and heraldry of Gurkha fighters. It is known to many people as simply the "Gurkha Blade" or "Gurkha Knife"."

    My best friend was Peace Corp. Nepal. He owns three and brought me back one as well. They're awesome, btw! The one I have is the larger size and heavy as can be; a bit surprising, actually.

    As far as being an appropriate weapon on a Monk...? My views are the more weapons any class gets to use the better, but I won't sweat it.

    I just wanted to clear up what a Kukri really is on this thread.

    Thanks all.

    Snip
    Guilds -- Officer: Umber Hulks, Member: Knights of the Silver Dragon (KotSD)
    Characters: Nalinor (Human Rogue lvl 20), Cargonar (Dwarven Fighter lvl 11), Atlanon (Dwarven Fighter 11/Barb. 2). Beltakorr (Human Barb. 18/Fighter 2), Fleabite (Halfling Wiz. lvl 9), Skirahzalon (Drow Bard lvl 8).

  7. #27
    Community Member Stormanne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dragnmoon View Post
    Yup... I think they added Bruce Lee flicks to the Animation budget..
    Thats a very astute observation, considering Lee broke down Wing Chun, Ie Chin, Kung Fu, and Pa Kua to create Jeet Kun Do. He removed all the formal stances, unnecessary tradition, and incorporated the basic attack strings of each form. He later added bits and pieces of Tae Kwon Do, Akito, and Karate to fully flesh out his system.

  8. #28
    Community Member Stormanne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaldais View Post
    Sai is actually an underwater weapon, primarly used to pierce small boats or people. Chinese term for it is loosely translated to Water Parting Needles.
    The sai originated (in what can be considered its current form) in or about 1090 AD for moving and threshing bundles of rice. It was a precursor to the pitchfork in China..

  9. #29
    Community Member Kaldais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormanne View Post
    The sai originated (in what can be considered its current form) in or about 1090 AD for moving and threshing bundles of rice. It was a precursor to the pitchfork in China..
    Yes, but i'm talking about weapon usage not farm usage.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticTheurge View Post
    Special monk weapons: kama, nunchaku, quarterstaff, sai, shuriken, and siangham.

    That's it, unless you expand it via feats.
    meh.. list them all.

    -------
    Monks are proficient with club, crossbow (light or heavy), dagger, handaxe, javelin, kama, nunchaku, quarterstaff, sai, shuriken, siangham, and sling.

    Monks are not proficient with any armor or shields
    -------

    Funny how only the kama, quarterstaff, and shurikens are the only weapons that don't make you loose your centering. Clubs will make you lose your centering although they are supposed to be proficient with them. Candy Canes also make you loose your centering. Go figure.

  11. #31
    Community Member RazorrX's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missing Minds View Post
    meh.. list them all.

    -------
    Monks are proficient with club, crossbow (light or heavy), dagger, handaxe, javelin, kama, nunchaku, quarterstaff, sai, shuriken, siangham, and sling.

    Monks are not proficient with any armor or shields
    -------

    Funny how only the kama, quarterstaff, and shurikens are the only weapons that don't make you loose your centering. Clubs will make you lose your centering although they are supposed to be proficient with them. Candy Canes also make you loose your centering. Go figure.
    That is because . . .
    PHB 3.5 Pg 40 :

    Monks are proficient with certain basic peasant weapons and some special weapons that are part of monk training. The weapons which a monk is proficient are club, crossbow (light and heavy), dagger, hand axe, javelin, kama, nunchucku, quaterstaff, sai shuriken, siangham, and sling.


    (( DDO does that as well, but not all weapons are in game yet))

    PHB 3.5 PG 40:

    Flurry of Blows:
    When using flurry of blows, a monk may attack only with unarmed strikes or with special monk weapons (kama, nunchaku, quaterstaff, sai, shuriken, and siangham).


    Here we have DDO made Flurry of Blows basically 'centering' giving full AB vs the actual PnP version. This is their game, and thus their house rules. To that effect the whole "centering" thing is working pretty much in line with that concept of FOB = Centering = only a few weapons.

    You are proficient with many more than you can use to FOB. If you can not FOB with what you have in your hand you are not Centered. *shrug* I can live with it.

    I would like feats to add some more weapons as FOB weapons. Like the Kukri, daggers, short swords, long sword, etc. but am not too upset if that never happens.
    This space for Rent

  12. #32
    Community Member fatherpirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,361

    Default

    I would be happy if you could use a feat to turn a weapon you are prof at into a KI weapon.

    I know sounds like an odd statement cuz monk weapons are KI weapons.
    I am saying it from the point of view of a multiclass monk

    So

    If you had say...a monk/ranger...you could spend a feat to turn your longbow prof into a monk weapon
    (so using it does not uncenter you)

    I would put a restriction on it

    By having the feat you remove the uncenter effect, but still should not get the improved weapon speed..that should be
    reserved for unarmed, kama, staff, star and the feat should be very specific...not 'martial weapons' more like 'longswords' or 'longbows' or 'thrown daggers'

    also, exclude repeating crossbows...trust me on that :-P
    Last edited by fatherpirate; 05-30-2008 at 01:52 PM.

  13. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missing Minds View Post
    meh.. list them all.
    I did.

    Proficiency doth not a special monk weapon make.
    Have a question about the Eberron Setting?
    Ask a Loremaster.

  14. #34
    Community Member fatherpirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,361

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticTheurge View Post
    I did.

    Proficiency doth not a special monk weapon make.

    Very true

    It would be NICE if you could use a feat to overcome that restriction,
    however it would be a DDO house rule....so not holding my breath.

  15. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatherpirate View Post
    It would be NICE if you could use a feat to overcome that restriction,
    however it would be a DDO house rule....so not holding my breath.
    Not in several cases.

    Eberron has feats that allow you to use longswords, double-bladed swords and longspears as special monk weapons.
    Have a question about the Eberron Setting?
    Ask a Loremaster.

  16. #36
    Founder Rickpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    511

    Default

    Real world Tibetan monks don't fight... with the possible exception of the Dob Dobs, a brutish sort that are employed to guard some Gelugpa school monasteries.

    "The Dob - dob are a special body of monks, found only in the great monasteries of Drepung, Sera and Ganden, distinguished for their physical strength and courage. Young monks who are strong and active and who can't find a teacher or are bad at learning, are drawn to join one of the groups into which the Dob - dob organize themselves and which go in for the most strenuous sports and exercises. They used to meet, as soon as it was light, in a sandy valley to the west of Sera, take a shower under a cold waterfall or a dip in a little stream and then run naked in the sand, wrestle, or practise carrying and throwing heavy stones. The most important exercise was long - jumping off a raised ramp and formerly there were great competitions with the Dob - dob of Drepung who were Sera’s long - standing rivals. The competition had to be stopped some time ago because there was a big fight and a monk was killed; but it was a Dob – dob’s ambition to be a good jumper and tough and skilful in all sports."

    http://www.thdl.org/xml/showEssay.ph....xml&l=d1e1507

    It doesn't appear that these fighting monks used weapons beyond sticks, rocks, and their own limbs. My guess Tibetan monks were a not factor in contriving the D&D monk.
    Last edited by Rickpa; 05-30-2008 at 03:54 PM.

  17. #37
    Founder Drider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Kukri's aren't even martial arts weapons. Just because they are from "Asia", doesn't make them one.

  18. #38
    Founder Drider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticTheurge View Post
    Ouch.

    You've seen the new unarmed animations, right?

    I think someone doesn't realize how much animations can actually cost.

  19. #39
    Community Member CSFurious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,580

    Default no

    go tell that to some Filipino or Indonesian martial artists

    the kukri is used in SE Asian martial arts

    just because Mr. Migayi's ancestors on Okinawa did not use it to fight the samurai does not make it any less of an Asian martial weapon than the farming implements

    the American equivalent would be the Bowie knife

    you should research more before you post incorrect statements

    Quote Originally Posted by Drider View Post
    Kukri's aren't even martial arts weapons. Just because they are from "Asia", doesn't make them one.

  20. #40
    Founder Drider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    go tell that to some Filipino or Indonesian martial artists

    the kukri is used in SE Asian martial arts

    just because Mr. Migayi's ancestors on Okinawa did not use it to fight the samurai does not make it any less of an Asian martial weapon than the farming implements

    the American equivalent would be the Bowie knife

    you should research more before you post incorrect statements

    Funny being filipino and having taken some Escrima.. we never used a kukri.. the kris and butterfly knife yes.

    The only martial art that I can even thing that uses it.. is Bando.. and that's because the Kukri is like the national knife of Burma and they start carrying the things when they are young.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload