Just think if you go the HP line with mineral.
+45 hps, Heavy fort, +5 protection +6 con skills.
Say bye bye to Minos Legens.
Just think if you go the HP line with mineral.
+45 hps, Heavy fort, +5 protection +6 con skills.
Say bye bye to Minos Legens.
So the Dominant Focus theory is confirmed.
Proposed Order, Dominant to Submissive: Earth, Air, Water?, Fire?, Positive, Negative
To err on the side of caution, I'm going to put question marks on Water and Fire until we see combined shards. I understand that the description suggests this order since dominant focuses seem to be listed first, I'm just looking for proof.
Ink
why bye to minos legens it still gives stacking toughness.
good at business
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.
Just a quick note because I'm worried you might be about to waste some ingredients... The FEE and EDM supreme shards will not combine on the altar of devastation - I strongly advise against chosing this ingredient combination.
Since Earth will trump Fire when the shards are combined - chose which tier 3 effect you want from the list of six Earth weapon effects (Acid Blast, +4 AC, +2 WIS, +2 CON, Acid Absorption etc...) then make sure you create a corresponding Fire shard with the same gem and essences (e.g. if you chose to add Acid Blast, create an EDM and a FDM) . I do not believe the gems and essences you used in tier 1 and 2 play a part in the tier 3 effect or tier 3 bonus effect.
Good luck, and be sure to post the results here - Magma II on a weapon should be fun!
Garth
Garth 20/ftr (Kensei) Haeson 20/clr Cairis 12/ftr 6/rgr 2/rog Xortan 20/wiz
Tinosa 20/brd Garthbot 20/fvs Gaarth 18/ftr 1/rgr 1/rog (Stal Def)
Tibetan 20/mnk Automatic DDO raid timers Haezon 20/sor (Conj)
In this post CoisonJade describes how he put Positive leftmost in the altar then Earth (then power cell), and still got an Earth imbued supershard. This shows that shard order in the altar doesn't matter and instead it's determined by elemental dominance.
See Ink's post here or my post here for more details on this theory (maybe I should say axiom now)
Garth
Garth 20/ftr (Kensei) Haeson 20/clr Cairis 12/ftr 6/rgr 2/rog Xortan 20/wiz
Tinosa 20/brd Garthbot 20/fvs Gaarth 18/ftr 1/rgr 1/rog (Stal Def)
Tibetan 20/mnk Automatic DDO raid timers Haezon 20/sor (Conj)
Last edited by SneakThief; 03-08-2008 at 02:14 AM.
See, even the EULA says its a game and supposed to be fun. EvilDuckie-DuckieBotOriginally Posted by EULA
random off-topic question..
but if you craft an existential stalemate ITEM (not weapon) do you still get the +6 wisdom?
Aesch - Ranger 13|Paladin 3 ~ Aeschill - Sorceror 16You Cant Shake The Devil's Hand and Say You're Only Kidding.
Mhykke(Pldn):Mhykkelle(Srcr):Mykkelle(Rngr):Mhykael(Clrc):Mykke(Brbrn):Mhykel(Ftr):Mhykelle(Wzrd):Mhyke(Brd):Mykkael(Rgr/Rog/Barb):Mykkel(Rog):Mhykkaelsan(Mnk):Mhykkael(FVS):Mhykkel(Brd):Markas(Ret.Srcr)
Here's a Tier 2 Aspect of Vacuum khopesh I made tonight. The screenshot is just for fun for anyone who wants to see it. I went Material Negative Dominion at Tier 1, and Material Air Dominion at Tier 2.
I'm about 2 ingredients away from having enough large ingredients to upgrade one of my Tier 2 items/weapons. The biggie is deciding what to upgrade first, lol!
It would be great if more screenshots could be put up of the various aspects. Has anyone upgraded either Aspect of Steam, or Aspect of Vacuum yet? I'm curious about the results.
Cheers,
Sharzade
Last edited by Sharzade; 03-08-2008 at 06:35 AM.
DDO Store FTW
THELANIS MAIN ACCT CHARACTERS
Sharzadee ~ yKaterina ~ Darya ~Ashin ~ Setareh ~ Pixxie
Kisheeni ~ Divae ~ Szapphire ~ Vyxun ~ Lusipha ~ Silkey
MyDDO: http://my.ddo.com/sharzade/
With at least two tests of this that have now failed, I think we can assume at this point that the order in which the two shards are placed into the altar when they are combined has no bearing on what is listed as the "dominate" focus on the dual imbued shard.
I concur about the "dominate" order of the focuses, but I'm not certain if the "dominate" focus has a bearing on "four focus enchantments". I wouldn't agree the "dominate" focus theory has been confirmed because we don't know for certain about why land and sky I failed to upgrade to land and sky II. Until we know what caused it to fail for a certainty, because it followed the pattern of "dominate" order focus yet failed, we can't assume the theory is correct when there is a fail to that theory that Eladrin stated outright wasn't due to a bug, but an error in the upgrade. The fail could be, as Willphase suggested previously, due to it being a little trickier, which keeps the theory of "dominate" focus alive, but without knowing specifically why land and sky failed to upgrade, we can't conclude at this point that the "dominate" focus theory is confirmed.
I'm interested in playing off the idea of the "dominate" focus and seeing what ideas we can come up with because I find it interesting that the developers gave us a visable clue in the descriptions of the aspects/balances as to what focus would end up dominating in the dual shard. I can't dismiss this as coincidental that this works. But, I'm not ready to state that the reason they listed a "dominate" focus on the dual shard was for anything beyond letting us know what focus would dominate in the effects we receive from the Altar of Devastation. This clue/listing of a "dominate focus" may not have anything to do with the "4 focus enchantments" at all. It may simply be for the purpose of letting us know which focus the dual shard was going to use for the third level upgrade effects prior to combining it with our item. It could have a bearing on the "4 focus enchantments" but I wouldn't assume at this point that is the case... listing a "dominate" focus on the dual shard lets people know which one would take precedent at the Altar of Devastation for the effects imparted at that altar.
That said, I'm wondering about something. At the Altar of Devastation your item thus far has "focus a" and "focus a or b" on it. If we run with the idea that the "dominate focus" of the dual shard is "a or b" also, could the order in which we place the item and the dual shard into the altar matter? Example:
dual focus shard.. magma with dominate focus of earth
item with magma I
earth, fire (earth dominate magma shard)
(earth dominate magma shard) fire, earth
This would allow for all magma I to be upgraded to magma II. Eladrin has stated that all I's can be upgraded to a II, so the order in which the first two focuses appear would have to not matter in order for this to be possible.
It also might explain why land and sky failed to upgrade.
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.
Sharzade, when you use your weapon, do you suffer a negative level? I've been curious about unholy damage typing on green steel weapons because at one point we had unholy weapons dropping in game, and they always resulted in a neg level penalty when weilded because we can't take an evil alignment.
I noticed that green steel blanks are "evil, magic" but didn't get a neg level from eq'ing it.
I assume the "vampiric" hp sapping effect of wearing more than one green steel accessory was done for this purpose, but if they aren't going to go with the same penalty, they should retroactively change the old unholy weapons to not give a neg level to be consistant... not sure how many people still have these items hidden away somewhere in their inventory/banks though to make this a worthwhile consideration, but we've made retroactive changes to other weapons in game before to make them in keeping with effects that came out later... The Star of Irian for example.
Quotes from developers about "Concordant Opposition" found elsewhere:
When someone asked about why it was worded hp and sp when it only was giving them one or the other:
When someone asked about why such a low % and suggested perhaps 3-5:
The response seems to me to imply that multiple "Concordant Oppositions" stack with each other in some way.
I may have missed it -- Why is the dominant focus proven? Why have we decided that it cannot be controlled based upon a specific essence / gem combination?
Am I correct to conclude that the combination of two supreme shards will only produce the bonuses from just 1 of the supreme shards, and then a bonus power (or set bonuses) is added ?
I'm planning to make Ice Goggles
Altar 1: Focus Air, Escalation, Ethereal = Air [Wizardry VI, +1 Cha skills]
Altar 2: Focus Water, Dominion, Ethereal = Water [Greater Frost Lore], together is Ice [Polar Ray x2]
Altar 3: (Focus Air, Escalation, Ethereal) [Air +100 SP, +3 CHA skills] plus second shard
(Focus Water, Dominion, Ethereal) Water) [Water unknown on equipment], together is Ice II [unknown special power]
Altar 3 will only give me one of Air +100 SP & +3 CHA skills OR the unknown Water benefit? I want to get the +100 SP addition.
Regardless, I should still get the unknown power of Ice II ? Im guessing a Freezing Ice Guard.
Last edited by winsom; 03-08-2008 at 08:49 AM.
Nightshayde, Wiz 24 (Ghallanda), Kyonna, Dru 24, Irnaetha, Mnk 19, Drelzna Art12/Rog2, Aurelyn, Pal11/Ftr2, Eidoloni, Rog 17, Tymore, Sor 20 (Khyber)
"Traps don't do damage. They ask you to do damage to yourself." -Andy Menard
Release your inner dwarf. Then get him some ale!
DDOwiki.com, #1 source for DDO information.