Results 1 to 20 of 47

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Community Member Slapphappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    103

    Default Advice on crowd control spells

    What mix of spells provides efective crowd control at low, mid and high levels?

    (I am posting this question on the wizard forum too.)

    thanks,
    Slapphappy, (on behalf of Mezmer)

  2. #2

    Default

    My bards love:
    Glitterdust
    Soundburst
    Otto's Dance (all versions)
    Hypnotize
    Daze Monster
    Hold Person/Monster

    Jules

    Ladies - Mediclady, Elspyth, Warchantress, Bittt, Julez, LilBitt, Bucketoboltz, Skitty, Kerro, Wyntermoon, Kethrey, Kethree, Selany, Gypsie, Cassyopeya, Tinkerbelle, Dyanya, PallasAthene

  3. #3
    Community Member CSFurious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,580

    Default have given up on bards & cc-spells

    my capped sor can just do it better

    i think bards help their fellow players best as buffers &, for me, as warchanters

    fascinate is the bard's best cc

  4. #4
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Hogwash that a sorcerer can do it better because I have both. :P

    On my bard about 90% of my CC (other than fascinate) is a heightened hypnotize, with a few others (charm monster) thrown in.

  5. #5
    Community Member CSFurious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,580

    Default used to be good last year

    i used to take heighten on my dead bards as well

    wasted feat on a feat-starved class IMO

    sors cast about twice as fast & have at minimum 50% more mana then bards

    so if your bard can enchant as effectively as your sor, i would reroll your sor

    Quote Originally Posted by Avonwey View Post
    Hogwash that a sorcerer can do it better because I have both. :P

    On my bard about 90% of my CC (other than fascinate) is a heightened hypnotize, with a few others (charm monster) thrown in.
    Last edited by CSFurious; 12-13-2007 at 11:42 AM.

  6. #6
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    so if your bard can enchant as effectively as your sor, i would reroll your sor
    The Charisma on my Bard (32) is almost as same as the Charisma on my Sorc (34). So I give up 1 on my dc. But other than that I don't get how a hypnotize from a Bard is any less effective than a hypnotize from my sorcerer.

    Yes, my Sorcerer is able to enchant more quickly than my Bard. And my Sorcerer can cast more hypnotizes than my bard. But since I never run out of SP, and you don't need to spam cast CC spells, I still dispute your claim that there's any noticeable difference.

  7. #7
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    my capped sor can just do it better

    i think bards help their fellow players best as buffers &, for me, as warchanters

    fascinate is the bard's best cc
    Battle Bards work fine without the warchanter enhancement. A pure Bard is usually about even with a warchanter because most of them MC and end up with about the same song power as a Pure Bard.

    Even with two pure 14 level Bards 8/6 versus 9/8 is hardly the end of the world.

    Plus there are lots of other very useful Bard builds...

  8. #8
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    The only other spell that I would add to Jules list is mass suggestion which is very effective and also a crowd control spell of sorts.

  9. #9
    Community Member CSFurious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,580

    Default definitely

    if you just want to buff & stand in the back & watch & maybe throw in a heal now & then

    Quote Originally Posted by EinarMal View Post
    Plus there are lots of other very useful Bard builds...

  10. #10
    Community Member CSFurious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,580

    Default enchanting battle bards

    there are only so many things that you can do in a fight

    i would think that a battle bard would let the squishy sor or wiz enchant & just wade right into battle

    but, if you have great fast-twitch skills & drink lots of mountain dew (i love diet code red), enchant away

    also, calling yourself a battle-bard without the warchanter enhancement is sort of like buying a porsche with an automatic transmission

    Quote Originally Posted by EinarMal View Post
    Battle Bards work fine without the warchanter enhancement. A pure Bard is usually about even with a warchanter because most of them MC and end up with about the same song power as a Pure Bard.

    Even with two pure 14 level Bards 8/6 versus 9/8 is hardly the end of the world.

    Plus there are lots of other very useful Bard builds...
    Last edited by CSFurious; 12-13-2007 at 11:42 AM.

  11. #11
    Community Member nbhs275's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    there are only so many things that you can do in a fight

    i would think that a battle bard would let the squishy sor or wiz enchant & just wade right into battle

    but, if you have great fast-twitch skills & drink lots of mountain dew (i love diet code red), enchant away

    also, calling yourself a battle-bard without the warchanter enhancement is sort of like buying a porsche with an automatic transmission
    lol why? they get a total of +1 damage over a bards maxed songs if they arent pure bard, and even if they are pure its still a neglegible difference except in the rarest of situations.

    Thats like saying a melee without a shield cant have ac.
    Aundair, New Khyber
    Alreck Gingerbarrel(15clr/1barb), Torrak Gingerbarrel(16 Brd), Oat(13 Rgr/3Ftr), Moxxy(16 Sor), Thorrac Gingerbarrel(6 Pal/1 Ftr) <<Current Toons>>

  12. #12
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    i would think that a battle bard would let the squishy sor or wiz enchant & just wade right into battle
    Yeah, and I would think that a battle bard would use his ephn brain and fascinate everything before he started swinging. But the above is likely the outer limits of the confines of your toon- if you're a casting bard, cast. If you're a fighting bard, fight. Unga-bung.
    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    also, calling yourself a battle-bard without the warchanter enhancement is sort of like buying a porsche with an automatic transmission
    Massively, massively cramped thinking. It will be nice when someone comes along to feed you something intelligent to parrot, but until then comments like this are tiresome and serve only to demonstrate your complete lack of creativity.

  13. #13
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post
    also, calling yourself a battle-bard without the warchanter enhancement is sort of like buying a porsche with an automatic transmission
    Yeah because prior to that existing no Bard could actually fight without that additional +1/+2 to inspire courage

    It's not worth commenting further than that as you have shown time and again how narrow minded you are when it comes to anything that is not cookie cutter flavor of the month...

  14. #14
    Community Member Samadhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CSFurious View Post

    also, calling yourself a battle-bard without the warchanter enhancement is sort of like buying a porsche with an automatic transmission
    I must disagree with that one. Both my "standard" bard and battle bard are spellsingers and I would not change it. The best part of the warchanter is the DR 5 on the song - but you can get DR 3 pretty easily with standard equipment. Meanwhile your spellsinger has an extra 100 mana to keep himself displaced throughout the mission (not even counting the 10% benefit from the spellsinging itself). It's arguable, I will admit, but even given no equipment considerations for "close DR" constant displacement should outshine the benefits of DR. Self-displacement is where the battle bard can really shine; give me the spellsinger.

    Now, does the DR 5 effect everyone? Yes, but... most barbarians will get no benefit from it because their personal DR is already higher. These bonuses do not stack. Your average WF or fighter will get some benefit, but not a lot. While a common choice, warchanter is far from the only choice and is extremely arguable about whether it is the best.
    sravana, kirtana, smarana, dasya, atma-nivedana
    ...NAMASTE...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload