Do the devs realize the new Extend Spell change hurts paladins and rangers?

[BUpcott]

Nm, arguing for arguments sake now with people that like to tell others how their character should be built and played.

I am not telling people how to play or build their characters. I am saying don't get upset when there is a change to a feat designed for primary casters that benefits them overall, especially when you are still going to benefit from the purpose of the feat. It was also suggested that if your build is in fact meant to be a melee that it might be a good idea to take more combat oriented feats. I understand there are different builds and appreciate that. (Heck I have a Dwarven Sorcerer, think I have only seen like 1 or 2 others.) But Tavok is the only one who has justified it by saying he tends to throw out a lot of heals and such, rather than saying that he simply wants to save sp.

Because he builds characters different than you do, simple really.

Thanks for pointing that out. Because I couldn't figure that out on my own.

Tavok build makes sense though. He said he usually groups in 3 man groups so the need for him to have the sp for heals and a couple buff makes sense. He also said he will more than likely be grabbing IMT instead now. The added SP is probably going make up for when he has to cast a buff twice. He moaned about the change, sucked it up and dealt with it. He didn't ask Turbine for compensation either. /salute Tavok