A conversation about the white dragonscale robes in General Discussion got me to thinking again about something that's been bugging me for a while now.
My halfling Rogue recently hit level 9, and now has exceeded the Max Dex bonus on his +5 Mithral Chain Shirt. He has a +5 Studded Leather and +5 Leather in the bank, but loses AC if he equips either of those as alternatives to the MCS. Once your DEX hits 24 (for us lowly non-dwarves), leather and studded leathers become obsolete in favor of mithral armors.
As he continues to level and acquire treasure, he will get access to better +DEX items, better +Armor items, DEX enhancements, DEX tomes, and additional stat points. By my math, a race with a natural +2 to DEX can start with as much as 20, and increase to about 36-38 by level 14. That's a modifier of +13 or +14, but since 38 would require finding a race restricted +7 DEX item and a +3 DEX tome, let's call it 36. That's still +13 to AC...the equivalent of a 10 DEX human equipping +5 fullplate.
Now by 14, he can also equip +7 race-restricted armored bracers, and can use a +5 mithral heavy shield of stability, and a protection +5 item. With all of the other items I can tack on, he can easily reach into the 40s on his AC.
Unless he wears armor. Someone mind explaining that one to me?
Now I realize this is a PnP staple, been around for quite some time. You don't get your full dex bonus in plate, because it's bulky. Fine. Put a high-dex dwarven fighter with the right enhancements into some MFP, and he can reduce that to the equivalent of padded armor. Silly for a race of stout miners with stubby legs, but whatever.
Since non-metal armors don't get any kind of equivalent to mithral, and can't deliver the AC of metal armors, they are worthless. Other than roleplaying reasons (and we don't even have druids yet), why would someone use hide armor over say mithral chainmail?
And moreover, why are armors like padded considered so restrictive? Why don't dex-based classes like rangers and rogues and bards have equivalent enhancements for more fluid movement in light armors (especially non-metal ones)?? For that matter, why don't classes like barbarians have similar enhancements for medium armors (especially hide)?
And how exactly is it that bulky flowing ankle-length wizard robes have no max dex bonus? Watch a robe-clad person sneak sometime and tell me that a real person wouldn't be stepping on those robes, or have other people stepping on them. Certainly there is no way that padded armor is so much more restrictive than robes to impose a penalty greater than that of the difference between leather and full plate (and I say greater because as the level cap increases the gap between max dex 8 and unlimited max dex will widen).
Now I'm not saying to nerf robes with a max dex bonus (although maybe I should), but can you at least toss a bone to us light and medium armor proficient classes that currently have to choose between gimping our AC or wearing dresses?
Bring the noise.
Cheers............