Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 178
  1. #81
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by gemineye View Post
    I thought you weren't gonna cry about it?
    didnt, and i aint. just wanted to say thanks.
    woundweaver 20 cl woundcleaver 20 barb woundbleeder 17 barb woundreaver 20 ftr woundheal 18 cl
    woundedsoul 20 fvs woundedfist 20 monk woundshadow 20 fvs woundtoaster 20 wiz woundtusk 15 monk

  2. #82
    Community Member Cyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,362

    Default

    Can we get a test to see if this stacks with haste/madstone?
    Proud Recipient of At least 8 Negative Rep From NA Threads.
    Main: Sharess
    Alts: Avaril/Cyr/Cyrillia/Garagos/Inim/Lamasa/Ravella

  3. #83
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    0

    Default

    fact of the matter is, as i originally posted, is that nothing decent can ever be in this game. number crunchers are always psychoanalyzing everything. personally, i dont know how they have time to play. but even the tiniest thing that someone thinks that someone else has over them ALWAYS gets posted here. then nerfed, without a kiss or dinner.

    so what if the capstone gives a bit of haste? so does reconstruct for warforged. we are barbs for chrissake, and finally coming into the place we should be in this game. barbs should be doing a little more dps than a fighter. period. why is this even an issue? if you want a barb, roll a barb.

    all im saying is posting things that are a bonus, and nothing wrong with, is just asking for a nerf. and it always pi$$e$ many off. so, for those that wanna analyze everything...go play the game for once. have fun. its what you pay for. if you want to talk about things that are odd or need fixing, how about ranged thrown weapons not being able to be repaired? i mean, if you are gonna complain, complain about something worthwhile. not something that isnt a problem. be thankful the **** pre works better than some classes'.

    is that enough critical bludgeon damage for ya? i mean, my name IS woundweaver...
    Last edited by woundweaver; 05-03-2010 at 03:25 PM.
    woundweaver 20 cl woundcleaver 20 barb woundbleeder 17 barb woundreaver 20 ftr woundheal 18 cl
    woundedsoul 20 fvs woundedfist 20 monk woundshadow 20 fvs woundtoaster 20 wiz woundtusk 15 monk

  4. #84
    Community Member Cetus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shade View Post
    Waaahh this class I never play possibly has some kinda small bug that I otherwise would of never knew about ever if I didn't read the forums.. omg nerf please.

    Shhh no one tell him about the secret extra +40 damage we get with the berserker set or the fact our runspeed boosts actaully provide more then you'd think!


    Except the fact the capstone doesn't increase glancing blow damage at all.

    Well since everyone on this thread seems to know whats intended and whats not like there some kinda dev themselves... I'll chime in too:
    The capstone is sposed to provide a +9000% damage increase to glancing blow dmg. So when the uber powerful secret boost we may or may not have gets fixed, they might even remember to fix the fact the capstone is severely broken anyways and thus we gain power either way.

    So either way fighter lovers (or should I say barbarian haters?): It's a lose-lose scenario for ya.
    Hey shade, when you become an authority on making a max dps character, maybe I'll treat your posts seriously.

    For now, you can work on that dual specced spring attack fighter you alway wanted to make.

    Back to my point:

    If fighters are given specialization enhancements, +8 to str power surge clickies, haste boosts etc for DPS. There is no reason why a Fighters dps cannot compete against a barbs- I showed that ever so clearly in my videos.

    Giving barbs the fighter capstone is in imbalance that NEEDS to be reworked, whether it be to improve the fighter or simply remove that from the barb.

    Since noone ever knew about it until it has been tested, barbs were just fine grabbing the capstone with the description taken for granted.

    Each capstone should retain its individuality. Thats what aggravates me.

  5. #85
    Community Member Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Durnak View Post
    Hey shade, when you become an authority on making a max dps character, maybe I'll treat your posts seriously.
    So I guess imediately sounds good to me:
    http://forums.ddo.com/forumdisplay.p...esc&sort=views

  6. #86
    Community Member Cetus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shade View Post
    So I guess imediately sounds good to me:
    http://forums.ddo.com/forumdisplay.p...esc&sort=views
    Lol!

    If I had all day, I'd start editing.

  7. #87
    Community Member MarcusCole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shade View Post
    So I guess imediately sounds good to me:
    http://forums.ddo.com/forumdisplay.p...esc&sort=views

    Maybe it's just me but I take quality over quantity any day.
    Ishamiel ~Rhayak ~ Badhorse ~Kyode ~ Drhorrible ~ Hjealmeh
    ChaosKnights ~~~ Argonnessan
    Quote Originally Posted by Eladrin View Post
    That's pretty awesome. Armor plated earslugs...

  8. #88
    Community Member Monkey_Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick_robinsonchia View Post
    I don't knw why people are complaining. All the number crunching seems to have taken the twitching attack rate with hidden capstone boost anyway. And the majority of those numbers support closeness In dps.... So what's the problem?
    I think people are complaining because they either
    1) Incorrectly see this as a buff to barbarian dps, putting an already top dps class even higher
    or
    2) More correctly realize that their non-pure barbarian THF build does 10% less dps then they thought it did.


    IMO this should not be "nerfed" it should be "fixed". By removing the 10% attack speed and correctly applying the (currently broken) bonus to glancing blow damage/procs that barbarians should have, pure barbarian dps will remain relatively unchanged (not nerfed). They would likely have slightly less single target dps in exchange for more AOE dps.

    Overall, with the 10% bonus to attack speed or with the glancing blow bonus, THF barbarian dps would be fine either way.

    The only issue for me is that I assumed that non-pure barbarians, paladins, fighters, etc... all attacked at the same speed. And, even with that inncorrect assumption none of them could compare with a pure barbarians dps. The fact that these already inferior (dps wise) builds are actually 10% lower then expected feels more like a nerf to them
    Last edited by Monkey_Archer; 05-03-2010 at 04:58 PM.
    Thelanis

  9. #89
    Community Member Dark-Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Did some rudamentary testing:

    My gtwf barb testing swing speed against a gtwf pure pali.

    No buffs, barb swung faster twf.

    No buffs, barb swung faster thf (neither of us had any thf feats).

    With Zeal cast on the Pali, swing speeds were identical twf and thf as far as we both could tell.

    Take it for what it's worth, as this was not done scientifically but with the naked eye, however we both came to the same conclusions watching the swing speeds.

    I'm sure someone will post a video to show the community definitely.
    Guilds: Prophets of the New Republic & Revenents Khyber
    Active:
    Clean 18barb/2ftr Cleen 20arti Kleaner 20monk Darkstaar Dark Knight Psyborg 20sorc Warrwitch 20wiz Roque 19rog/1mnk Killeric 18fvs/2monk AA Duality Helves Angel
    Builds: Helves Angel Hurtlocker Dark Knight Riddle of Steel

  10. #90
    Community Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey_Archer View Post
    I think people are complaining because they either
    1) Incorrectly see this as a buff to barbarian dps, putting an already top dps class even higher
    or
    2) More correctly realize that their non-pure barbarian THF build does 10% less dps then they thought it did.

    ~snip~

    The fact that these already inferior (dps wise) builds are actually 10% lower then expected feels more like a nerf to them
    +1 for the words of wisdom. This does not change DPS calcs for pure parbs, only those without the capstone.

  11. #91
    Community Member zealous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    731

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bufo_Alvarius View Post
    it just shows how terrible your logic is.
    Haste boost increases damage output by flat 30%.

    Damage boost increases damage output by 5damage/swing.

    A high end melee will have a damage output of in excess of 100damage/swing on average.

    30% of 100 is 30.

    30 is way bigger than 5.

    30 - 5 is 25, 25 is greater than the average of 6d6.

    Think about it
    ...
    That taking damage is somewhat inconsequential would hopefully be viewed as something undesired from a "fun and exciting point of view".

    That low defences is somewhat inconsequential would hopefully be viewed as something undesired from a "fun and exciting point of view".

    If automatically taking damage and having low defences have an impact, there should hopefully be a trade off for it.
    Last edited by zealous; 05-03-2010 at 06:42 PM.

  12. #92
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    For what it's worth you have to ask yourself if the barbs more hp and dr is better than the fighters possibility of sacrificing dps for ac.... otherwise what does the fighter get?

    Now weather or not the barb or the fighter should be more survivable and less dps or which should be less survivable with more dps is up for debate (although personally think barbs should be ultimate damage dealers)

    If anyone has arguments for fighters being more defensive than barb would like to hear them.

    Keep in mind also that 2hf is less investment in stat points than the 2wf we are talking about ... I guess another question is if the 2hf barb does more damage then the 2hf fighter.... of course I guess the extra fighter bonus feats have a huge impact as well.

    Just goes to show how they are two different classes (surprise surprise). Of course If barbs gave up some of their defenses they should definitely get more dps. But at this point I see survivability and easier stat point spread as a trade off for slightly slightly more dps and tons more feats.

  13. #93
    Community Member Monkey_Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark-Star View Post
    Did some rudamentary testing:

    My gtwf barb testing swing speed against a gtwf pure pali.

    No buffs, barb swung faster twf.

    No buffs, barb swung faster thf (neither of us had any thf feats).

    With Zeal cast on the Pali, swing speeds were identical twf and thf as far as we both could tell.

    Take it for what it's worth, as this was not done scientifically but with the naked eye, however we both came to the same conclusions watching the swing speeds.

    I'm sure someone will post a video to show the community definitely.
    Hmm, interesting...

    Seems TWF barbs might actually be higher dps then originally thought then...
    Might even put THF barbs behind now..
    Will have to reconsider the value of tempest barbs and 18/2 barbs...
    Thelanis

  14. #94
    Community Member Monkey_Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Progen View Post
    If anyone has arguments for fighters being more defensive than barb would like to hear them.
    A fighter that has defense (ac) will never come even remotely close to barb dps.
    A fighter with max dps, will not have nearly the same defense that a barb gets (hp an dr)
    Thelanis

  15. #95
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    Which is of course the tradeoff. So just some stuff to think about before demanding that barbs be more dps ect with the current way fighters and barbs work.

  16. #96
    Community Member Cetus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey_Archer View Post
    A fighter that has defense (ac) will never come even remotely close to barb dps.
    A fighter with max dps, will not have nearly the same defense that a barb gets (hp an dr)
    I can justify counter to your second point. I sit at mid 900's sustained hp- watch my dragon video on the fighter forums.

  17. #97
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    In which case you trade off your bonus feats and the boni boil down to a very small increase in damage for a relatively decent amount of DR.

  18. #98
    Community Member zealous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    731

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey_Archer View Post
    A fighter that has defense (ac) will never come even remotely close to barb dps.
    A fighter with max dps, will not have nearly the same defense that a barb gets (hp an dr)
    This is a separate issue I would say.

    With AC having such a low importance due to
    A. Mob tohit
    B. Massive healing potential.

    With hp having such a high importance due to
    A. Massive healing potential
    B. Lag/healer responsiveness
    (C. Mob damage)

    Would high end game play be much different if incoming damage to characters simply was replaced with a %death on hit dependant on the amount of hp you have?. That way it'd be clearer. If you like to watch red bars the %death could be a timed debuff, you wouldn't die til timer was gone, healing could be replaced with a remove death debuff.


    A simplified system like that could remove alot of computation thus reducing lag^^

    [edit:]Imo the game would be more interesting if you couldn't just heal through everything and if there was a tradeoff to foregoing defences.
    Last edited by zealous; 05-03-2010 at 07:24 PM. Reason: Clarification

  19. #99
    Community Member Boromirs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    986

    Default

    I see fighters as a middle ground. Not as good in DPS as barbarian but not terrible in the defense department. As of now however, fighters have NO role in either defense or offense. Mainly because, a minute increase in AC doesn't matter toward endgame and DR is more important. Barbarians have all the right stuff and none of the wrong ones toward end game, best DPS, low AC (doesn't matter), high free DR (matters). Further, due to their insane strength they can jack up their DC (read: skill checks for trip/sunder/stun) to higher levels then even a specced out fighter.

    Summarize,

    Barbarians = Every possible advantage in combat over fighter.

    Fighter = they get a big fat 0, I challenge you to name 1 thing that a fighter just hands down beats the barb in.

  20. #100
    Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boromirs View Post
    I see fighters as a middle ground. Not as good in DPS as barbarian but not terrible in the defense department. As of now however, fighters have NO role in either defense or offense. Mainly because, a minute increase in AC doesn't matter toward endgame and DR is more important. Barbarians have all the right stuff and none of the wrong ones toward end game, best DPS, low AC (doesn't matter), high free DR (matters). Further, due to their insane strength they can jack up their DC (read: skill checks for trip/sunder/stun) to higher levels then even a specced out fighter.

    Summarize,

    Barbarians = Every possible advantage in combat over fighter.

    Fighter = they get a big fat 0, I challenge you to name 1 thing that a fighter just hands down beats the barb in.
    Haven't we just gone over this? DPS (sure sure argue all you want on this) AND FEATS (if this isn't a handdowns winner I don't know what is)!

    EDIT: also some minor ones... increased to-hit (calculations have been done in other threads... wins by like 2-3) increased crit-range (on crit effects), and of course haste boost for faster swinging of vorpals and such. (also falls under dps)
    Last edited by Progen; 05-03-2010 at 07:29 PM.

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload