PDA

View Full Version : wiki needs one page with all tradeable weapons, ravenloft, saltmarsh, etc



Mindos
12-25-2021, 08:01 PM
I keep forgetting about the trade in weapons with each area. The sharn weapons, the saltmarsh ones, the fey ones, etc.

I with there was just one page on the wiki that listed them all. Where the trader is, what the qualities are, what the min levels are, etc.

dredre9987
12-25-2021, 11:00 PM
SSG has nothing to do with the wiki. Might want to bring it up there.

TedSandyman
12-26-2021, 12:04 AM
I keep forgetting about the trade in weapons with each area. The sharn weapons, the saltmarsh ones, the fey ones, etc.

I with there was just one page on the wiki that listed them all. Where the trader is, what the qualities are, what the min levels are, etc.

Sounds good. Make it.

Alrik_Fassbauer
12-26-2021, 10:13 AM
There already is a general page with crafting https://ddowiki.com/page/Crafting -
- it contains a sub-section called "Item Upgrading" : https://ddowiki.com/page/Crafting#Item_Upgrading

I think that this could be a good place to put this into.

"Flamesalt Weaponry" has its own page, but it seems to be under-linked : https://ddowiki.com/page/Flamesalt_Weaponry
Same with "Ferrocrystal Weaponry" : https://ddowiki.com/page/Ferrocrystal_Weaponry

I think that no-one bothers upgrading the Saltmarsh page because everyone simply takes any loot weapon and transforms it into a Legendary weapon directly, thanks to the overabundance of Saltmarsh Hay und the unbelievable scarcity of Quartermaster's Chits.



And, besides, the Wiki lives off those who put work into it !

C-Dog
12-28-2021, 08:48 AM
SSG has nothing to do with the wiki. Might want to bring it up there.
Wiki editors are players, and players who read the forums. This is a fine place to bring it up. :cool:


Sounds good. Make it.
Exactly.

You can always ask and hope that others will do the heavy lifting, but the best way is to just get it started, and it's likely that someone will come along and polish it. (Sounds like a "call/include" function might be the best solution, and that's above my wiki-fu.)