Casters if DC didn't matter what ED would you use?

[Xeno5k]

Would you still use Shriadi?

[Munkenmo]

Yes.

[Teh_Ghoul]

yes

[kwyjibo_lol]

Would you still use Shriadi?

Nope, I'd find another game. No save Shiradi casters are soulless droids, end of story. My 68 enchant dc seems to work well at the moment and I don't got get any cry babies winging over the loss of their precious kill.

[Daemoneyes]

Would you still use Shriadi?

what else? Draconic? hate that melee **** on a pure caster..

[NaturalHazard]

Sharadi yes

[voodoogroves]

I'm confused.

If DCs are unimportant you run a destiny that cares nothing for DCs. Like LD or Shiradi.

The bigger problem is that MAgister, while effective, is spectacularly bookishly un-fun. Draconic at least is blasty.

[taurean430]

Draconic for DPS Situations.

But there would be a lot of dancing/stoned/paralyzed/hula hooped/etc mobs about...

[Mattimeo_the_Sorcere]

I don't use Shiradi even now. I'd stick with Draconic Incarnation like I've always been doing. I've noticed that there are some nice Magister abilities a caster can twist in to boost their DCs or reduce the saves of enemies just by casting spells. Mix that with your favorite (non-Shiradi) ED and you should be fine on EE.

[RedOrm]

Casters if DC didn't matter what ED would you use?
Would you still use Shriadi?

Confused here also: I run shiradi because DC DOESN'T matter, that's the whole problem.
In Magister my DCs get a nice boost, but since rednames are immune, that means exactly nothing. In shiradi, my DAMAGE gets a serious boost, which does affect rednames-and thus I run shiradi.
On EE that is; on EH or below it doesn't matter what ED I use, they all die anyway.

Greetz,
Red Orm

[Sokól]

I play in shiradi and draconic just depends on mood and the quest.