Stormsinger Cloak-Anthem

[Promethie]

Is the anthem ability(regen bard songs) on the Stormsinger cloak broken?

Recently on my 11 bard/2 fighter I decided to test this out. I stepped into Searing Heights and used 6 of my 13 songs leaving me with seven songs left. I then went afk for about 20 minutes with the cloak equipped and Anthem showing in the examinaiton window. I came back 20 minutes later with still 7 songs.

This may be because of my fighter levels confusing the item for some reason. I do not have a pure bard to test on. If someone else does, it would be great if they could see if the Anthem on Stormsinger Cloak works for them.

[Grimgore]

Having the same issue, put in a bug report (like I did) and pray they think enough about it to look into it (unlike my Mantle issue) someday!

[kenderfall]

Yup just got one the other day for my spellsinger 2 no go on regen on songs sat in GH explorer zone after using all but 1 song cane back 30 mins later still had 1 song.Seemed like a good alt to bards cloak from VOD but now meh. :(

[TheDearLeader]

Oh hey. (http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=291482&highlight=Stormsinger)

Look at this. (http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=294271&highlight=Stormsinger)

Someone already has brought this up. Its been reported. The "bug team" knows about it.

Weak Search-Fu is weak.

[Hafeal]

There are better ways to convey information than this, your comments are unnecessary. A simple, "Hey, in case you missed it, there has been a report on this." would have been enough (-1).



Oh hey. (http://http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=291482&highlight=Stormsinger)

Look at this. (http://http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=294271&highlight=Stormsinger)

Someone already has brought this up. Its been reported. The "bug team" knows about it.

Weak Search-Fu is weak.

[TheDearLeader]

There are better ways to convey information than this, your comments are unnecessary. A simple, "Hey, in case you missed it, there has been a report on this." would have been enough (-1).

We can discuss the semantics/finer points of information delivery all you'd like in PMs.

This is the third thread on the matter, merely because someone can't be bothered to use the "Search" function. I replied at length in one of those threads, in two posts. The OP of *that* thread put in a link from thread #2 to his thread.

Sorry if I feel redundancy to the point of being redundant a bit too overredundant for my tastes. If that's -1 *worthy* in your book, I welcome it.

[Bilger]

We can discuss the semantics/finer points of information delivery all you'd like in PMs.

This is the third thread on the matter, merely because someone can't be bothered to use the "Search" function. I replied at length in one of those threads, in two posts. The OP of *that* thread put in a link from thread #2 to his thread.

Sorry if I feel redundancy to the point of being redundant a bit too overredundant for my tastes. If that's -1 *worthy* in your book, I welcome it.

It was the way you came across I think it may not be the right way to get your point across but was far from neg worthy.

[Solmage]

It was the way you came across I think it may not be the right way to get your point across but was far from neg worthy.

I think he got his point across rather well actually. Disliking the method/style does not discredit it's effectiveness.

(There is a reason lmgtfy.com was invented afterall :))

[Hafeal]

We can discuss the semantics/finer points of information delivery all you'd like in PMs.

This is the third thread on the matter, merely because someone can't be bothered to use the "Search" function. I replied at length in one of those threads, in two posts. The OP of *that* thread put in a link from thread #2 to his thread.

Sorry if I feel redundancy to the point of being redundant a bit too overredundant for my tastes. If that's -1 *worthy* in your book, I welcome it.

I found your original post to be derogatory and inflammatory, both within the guidelines of giving neg rep. At least I tell you I am giving it to you - unlike whomever gave me neg rep. I am not hiding behind the 'power'.

It could be there were other threads - perhaps someone did not see them. I did not. And no, I don't always do a search on every topic and I don't think that should be the expectation. You can ignore the thread just as easily as make inciteful responses. 10 year olds on up use the forums, as well as people across every time zone - not everyone operates on the same maturity level or sees threads at the same time. Unlike other threads, I did not find the original OP to be outlandish or proffering thoughts to inflame, thus I thought your response was overly aggressive, without humor, in return. My 2 cps.

[Hendrik]

Having the same issue, put in a bug report (like I did) and pray they think enough about it to look into it (unlike my Mantle issue) someday!

Yes, PLEASE bug it.

Be accurate, be detailed. For any attempt to get a bug fixed, you MUST be accurate and detailed. It is all in the details.

[Bilger]

I think he got his point across rather well actually. Disliking the method/style does not discredit it's effectiveness.

(There is a reason lmgtfy.com was invented afterall :))

Never said he didn't get his point across. All I said is his method may have not been the best but wasn't neg worthy.

He got his point across that wasn't my point. My point was that IMO it wasn't neg worthy.

[MrLarone]

tautology man decries redundancy... m'kay.

other than that i got nothing, thanks for providing the links =)