Simple Sign or Not Sign for DT Runes Bound to Account

[Valindria]

Edit2: Please go here: http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=254317 instead.



There are a ton of discussions on DT Armor.


Just searching the suggestion forum for "DT Armor" I got the following from the 1st two pages : 11 threads with 167 replies (so 178 posts).

Thread/Repilies
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=249699&highlight=DT+Armor 44
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=247209&highlight=DT+Armor 23
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=245568&highlight=DT+Armor 12
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=241832&highlight=DT+Armor 35
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=229879&highlight=DT+Armor 8
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=233292&highlight=DT+Armor 4
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=231520&highlight=DT+Armor 7
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=224946&highlight=DT+Armor 21
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=221986&highlight=DT+Armor 1
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=219242&highlight=DT+Armor 7
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=218532&highlight=DT+Armor 5

In General:
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=183446&highlight=DT+Armor 57

In this thread I would simply like to get a count of signatures (/signed or /not signed) for the following change:

"Draconic, Eldritch, Tempest, and Sovereign runes (from Reavers Refuge) are now Bound to Account"


1. /signed


Edit: I should adjust my platform a little bit. While I agree a lot could be done, I feel there is value to this small change. It will not address every issue people have with DT crafting, but it will go a long way for the amount of effort (in theory) it would take. Right now once you have the armor you are looking for there is little reason to run the quests again.


Pros:
- Promotes replay/grouping (if your armor is perfect maybe you have an alt)
- Makes it easier to to get what you want on other toons. For example If I have stacking runes I know what one is, I can transfer the other to a different toon.

Cons:
- Not enough of a change (i.e. Still requires a lot of grind to potentially get what you want.)
- Does little to address the lack of identifcation/lottery system.
- Does nothing for people with 1 toon.

[Xeroth]

/signed

[Halock]

There's alot of things on this topic i'd prefer to see, but as a quick fix that would do.

/signed

[ArloOne]

/signed

[Velexia]

/signed, although I would prefer unbound completely.

[Sweyn]

/signed

[Khellendros13]

/signed

[Nezichiend]

/signed

Please.

[SteeleTrueheart]

/signed

[KillEveryone]

/signed...and let us be able to identify them in some fashion.

[jadenkorr]

/signed

[vVAnjilaVv]

/signed for sure!!!!......not even worried about the identifying, but BtA would be awesome!.

[Merlocke]

/signed

[Eladiun]

/signed

Not that it matters much if i don't know what the rune does...22 Prey runes yesterday and still don't have the tier 2 effect I want.

[Gol]

/not_signed. Pointless change unless you can identify them (without wasting 1 in every stack).

[ArichValtrahn]

/not_signed. Pointless change unless you can identify them (without wasting 1 in every stack).

QFT.

/not_signed

[DoctorWhofan]

/not signed identifying first.

[Cyr]

/signed

Also no blind runes. Just tell us what they do up front. Lotto's suck.

[Gercho]

/not signed

The problem i see is that the devs may think thats enough solution for the problem, and isnt, i would rather see some other changes implemented than this one, though i aggree that it will be usefully, will be just a very minor improvement...

[Xionanx]

/not_signed - The ability to identify should be first, and frankly IF you can identify in the chest there should be no need to make them unbound or bound to account.

[Eeomis]

/signed

[Bolo_Grubb]

/not_signed. Pointless change unless you can identify them (without wasting 1 in every stack).


/not signed This change does nothing for those of us with limited play time and only 1 character.

[Zaheira]

/signed

And... identify rune power could be very very nice

[AussieEngineer]

/signed
(Though agree identifying them somehow would also be good)

[FluffyCalico]

/not signed

This does not reduce the grind which is what people are upset about. All this does is allow you to send your alt who cant do the quests the runes that he doesnt deserve.

[MrWizard]

/signed.

being able to give the extras ones you do not need to other toons makes the extra runs worthwhile instead of wasted.

horrid horrid grind for these runes.

[Lleren]

/signed

It is not perfect, but
The best, is the enemy of the good.

[Vhlad]

Even with this change it's still too grindy. The mechanic is terrible. Does using 285 sovereign runes to get dodge 3 sound fun? At #284 you've made no progress and there is no end in sight: you have the same partially finished armor that you had after run #1. The lack of progression and lack of reward for your time is too unencouraging.


/not_signed. Pointless change unless you can identify them (without wasting 1 in every stack).

transfer your character to lammania to identify everything

[sephiroth1084]

/signed if none of the other, better alternatives gets put into place (ie. being able to identify runes you've used already in the chest, being able to trade X runes for 1 rune of the enhancement of your choice, simply being able to identify runes in general, etc...).

[TechNoFear]

/signed that something needs to change


This does not reduce the grind which is what people are upset about. All this does is allow you to send your alt who cant do the quests the runes that he doesnt deserve.

I agree, but something is better than nothing and this would appear to be a low cost change (which means it might actually have a remote chance of making it to the list of things that could happen).

[gserlenga]

/signed

[Kza]

/not signed - Its not enough.

[Thrudh]

/signed